3

What is the next word(more than one is possible!) in the below sequence of words:

NO, ATE, OPTS, _ _ _ _ _ ?

Note:

1 Only standard English words(as per Oxford English Dictionary) are to be provided.

2 As multiple answers are possible, first correct entry wins

3 There can be other sets of words(which are altogether different from the above)- which can form such a sequence. This is /may not be the only one

4 Based on David R's answer, this is getting added: All the letters of the words are different OR there is no repeated letter in any of the words.

Mea Culpa Nay
  • 8,626
  • 1
  • 13
  • 45

4 Answers4

15

I think that it could be

PARSE (or any anagram thereof)

Reasoning

I think the $n$th term in the sequence is a word with $n$ letters which has the maximal number of anagrams so PARSE has APERS, APRES, ASPER, PARES, PEARS, PRASE, PRESA, RAPES, REAPS, SPARE, SPEAR (12 anagrams which I think is the most possible for 5 letters).

hexomino
  • 135,910
  • 10
  • 384
  • 563
6

I think the next word is

Queue

Because

Each word has only one vowel or consonant, alternating each word. NO is 1 of each, ATE is one consonant, OPTS is one vowel, and QUEUE is again one consonant.

Other options in English are

AUDIO, AERIE, and EERIE

With this logic, the 6 letter word could be

SNITCH and SPRING with possible entries for THIRTY, TWENTY, and SYSTEM, depending on whether or not you count the Y.

No 7 letter words follow this rule though.

David Robie
  • 420
  • 2
  • 8
6

My guess:

ITEMS

Reasoning:

ITEMS -> ITEMS, TIMES, EMITS, MITES, SMITE (each letter begins its own anagram).

tecu
  • 341
  • 1
  • 2
2

I believe the answer could be

Stare, or its other 4 anagrams: tears, rates, stear (old timey synonym of steer, as in, to stear a car) and earst (which means long ago).

Reason:

No has two anagrams: on, no, and two letters.
Ate has three anagrams: tea, eat, ate, and three letters. Opts has four anagrams: pots, stop, opts, tops, and 4 letters. Therefore the next must have five anagrams and five letters.

GridAlien
  • 495
  • 4
  • 10
  • rot13("bcgf" unf gjb zber nantenzf: "cbfg" naq "fcbg". Vg vf cebonoyl gur zbfg nantenznoyr frg bs 4 yrggref.) – Darrel Hoffman Feb 13 '20 at 21:08
  • @GridAlien: Yes, you are almost there, but missed by one word, that starts with E. Erst is a correct word, while earst is not, I am afraid. Nice try! – Mea Culpa Nay Feb 18 '20 at 14:12