37

Brazilian mathematician Inder Taneja has found a way of expressing every number between 1 and 11,111, except 10,958, by inserting mathematical operators in between the numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and evaluating the expression. He did so using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, and brackets, but avoiding factorials, square roots, and decimals. If these last three operations are allowed, can 10,958 be likewise expressed?

Glorfindel
  • 28,033
  • 9
  • 96
  • 142
Bernardo Recamán Santos
  • 18,674
  • 2
  • 37
  • 218

6 Answers6

36

Taking from

$(1 + 2 + 34) \times (5 × 6 + 7) \times 8 + 9 = 10961$

We have

$(1 + 2 + 34) \times (5 × 6 + 7) \times 8 + (\sqrt{9})! = 10958$

Marius
  • 18,049
  • 4
  • 54
  • 101
Pokemon
  • 1,689
  • 10
  • 12
  • 1
    Ha! I hadn't even thought of looking at the other solutions and finding one I could tweak! Here I was racking my brain from scratch! :) Nice one! +1 – wildBillMunson Jan 13 '17 at 07:06
  • 1
    +1 for the attempt. But don't you need to have an operator in between each number i.e you are using 34 directly? – thepace Jan 13 '17 at 08:28
  • 6
    Going by the OP, concatenation is allowed. – Pokemon Jan 13 '17 at 09:09
  • 3
    The solution uses both square roots and factorials, so it's not quite in the spirit of the paper. –  Apr 26 '17 at 04:13
28

Voila! With arithmetic operators, factorial and exponents:

$\mathbf{{(1+2^3)}^4 + 5 - 6! + 7! + (8 \times 9 )} = {(1+8)}^4 + 5 - 720 + 5040 + 72 = 6561 + 4397 = 10958$

rubik
  • 103
  • 4
thepace
  • 2,927
  • 1
  • 13
  • 11
6

PARTIAL ANSWER

This is as close as I can get:

(1+2)3+4 * 5 + (6 * 7) - 8 - 9 = 10960.

Maybe this will give someone an idea of how to get there!

wildBillMunson
  • 2,511
  • 13
  • 28
5

Matt Parker from the Numberphile YouTube channel found a solution and explains it in this video.

|| stands for concatenation. (ie: 1||0 x 2 = 20)

1 x 23 + ((4x5x6)||7 + 8) x 9

Concatenation is heavily used in the paper but I don't think it ever have been used that way. (ie:(2 x 3) || 2 = 62)

Does it's stand with the spirit of the paper? It's debatable.

4

Concatenation is ||

1 x 23 + ((4x5x6)||7 + 8) x 9

Rubio
  • 41,676
  • 6
  • 90
  • 242
guest
  • 39
  • 1
  • 2
    This checks out. QUESTION: Am I misreading the OP or does this solution satisfy the Taneja requirements without adding extra operators? since concatenation was allowed to begin with. – PatrickT Oct 21 '17 at 13:36
1

The closest I can get

$(12*3*4÷5*6*7+8)*9=10958.4$

Matheinstein
  • 473
  • 2
  • 11