Questions tagged [nuclear-weapons]

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from splitting atoms. Because the long-lived nuclear material used is then spread into the surrounding area, it is considered the most devastating weapon of war known to mankind. Use this tag to discuss the politics of obtaining them and using them in diplomacy

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from splitting atoms. These weapons generally use Plutonium, a radioactive metal almost always derived from the usage of uranium in what are known as heavy-water reactors. Civilian reactors tend to be light-water reactors, which do not produce Plutonium.

Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, and have been used twice in war, both times by the United States against Japan. Other notable political uses of nuclear weapons include

  • The Cuban Missle Crisis - The put ballistic nuclear missiles on to antagonize the United States. This marked a peak in tensions (with both countries set to wipe each other out with nuclear strikes) until the missiles were finally removed. To prevent anything similar from happening, the United States and USSR agreed to create what became known as the nuclear hotline, which allows direct diplomatic access between the two countries.
  • - In 1981, Iraq was building a French nuclear reactor. Israel, in Operation Opera, bombed the incomplete reactor to prevent Iraq from obtaining nuclear materials they feared could be used in a nuclear weapon
  • - Despite diplomatic promises to not develop nuclear weapons, North Korea has developed them and is actively testing ballistic missiles capable of reaching the United States
  • - The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action () was drafted and implemented by then President as a way to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The plan has been criticized as being too lax.
184 questions
24
votes
10 answers

Why don't all countries attempt to get rid of all nuclear weapons?

As long as nuclear weapons exist and some countries possess them, other countries will also wish to possess them. This is unavoidable. Since we all want to avoid that, what stands in the way of some of the major countries of the world coming…
user16953
23
votes
9 answers

Why not rely on submarines to avert a mutual nuclear destruction by mistake?

In the past, there were many false alarms in US and Soviet Union or Russia, about a nuclear attack from the other side. In a few minutes, and under great pressure, they had to decide whether to retaliate, which would bring about the end of the world…
Mark G
  • 239
  • 2
  • 3
4
votes
2 answers

MAD fails to account for a clash of civilisations - why would a state doomed by a first strike NOT retaliate?

I am too new to answer peoples questions, so I decided to post my own to frame the problem a different way. People assume that nuclear states hold nuclear weapons only to deter intimidation from other nations that hold them. However, it is not the…
3
votes
2 answers

Is the theory of nuclear peace true?

Taken from Wikipedia: Nuclear peace is a theory of international relations that argues that under some circumstances nuclear weapons can induce stability and decrease the chances of crisis escalation. Is this true that nuclear weapons…
Democrat
  • 655
  • 5
  • 9
2
votes
4 answers

Clear factors differentiating an an offensive from a minimum deterrent nuclear capability

Arms control specialist Cheryl Rofer argues that the nuclear weapon programs pursued by the dictatorships of Iran and North Korea were "Regime Change Deterrents": The nuclear strategies of North Korea and Iran, up to now, are not the strategies of…
mart
  • 724
  • 4
  • 12
1
vote
0 answers

Would Cold-War era nuclear-armed US ABM missiles cause a nationwide EMP effect while intercepting enemy missiles?

Interceptor missiles armed with high-yield nuclear warheads had flight ceilings of hundreds of miles (such as the Spartan interceptor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIM-49_Spartan) Given that a single warheads of a few hundred kilotons detonated at…
user204468
  • 19
  • 1
1
vote
1 answer

Have we already seen the collapses of the stability instability paradox?

Although we have seen less wars between nations we have seen an increasing amount of civil wars, which can lead to wars between nations.
Dammand Cherry
  • 943
  • 1
  • 8
  • 15
1
vote
0 answers

Nuclear weapons and stability

What are the arguments that nuclear weapons can provide some form of global stability in a multipolar and/or bipolar world?
farce
  • 35
  • 1
0
votes
2 answers

Nuclear Disarmament and assurence that countries will get rid of their weapons

If nuclear disarmament happens how can we be sure that other countries will get rid of their weapons?
-1
votes
2 answers

List of countries that can, without help, develop nuclear weapons

Is there a list which provides the nations that could, without either external expertise or external materials (say from current domestic inventory of nuclear energy industry), develop a nuclear weapon?
-1
votes
2 answers

What's the point of non-nuclear nations signing an agreement to ban nuclear weapons?

There have recently been news about US protests over Sweden signing an anti-nuclear treaty: US Secretary of Defence James Mattis sent a letter to Swedish Defence Minister Peter Hultqvist warning the Nordic nation of a negative impact on relations…
JonathanReez
  • 50,757
  • 35
  • 237
  • 435