Can someone explain what are the differences between a "process" and "process framework"?
Asked
Active
Viewed 4,093 times
-2
1 Answers
2
They aren't the same. A process framework provides the general principles for a process. It is the core if you will. A process implements the process framework, but it can have other tailored, unique or company specific components. For example, RUP is a process framework (it is generic), and when your company follows the principles of RUP (it is company specific the basic ideas are the same), it is a process.
Zsolt
- 11,928
- 1
- 27
- 60
-
thank you @Zsolt .i think i have a misunderstanding between those concepts so i liked to correct 1)a process framework(such as RUP,MDA,..etc) considered as a methodology for managing and implementing the set of processes and each process is A series of actions
#Does those actions need a methodology for implementing them as what we are noticed in implementing process?
2)the steps that lead to perform a RUP or any other methodology is called processes #Does this mean that using UML in any phase of RUP considered as a process?
– user2019510 Feb 04 '13 at 22:02 -
1, No they don't. The process framework explicitly defines what to do. 2, UML is a tool. If the process says that that tool must be used, you use it. Look at this way: process framework -> how you should do it, process -> how you actually do it. – Zsolt Feb 05 '13 at 07:41
A **Framework** is a model: a hypothetical description of a complex entity or **process**;. So, what's the underlying problem you're facing related to 'Framework x Process' concepts? – Tiago Cardoso Feb 04 '13 at 11:29