2

I saw this picture on one of my social media sites with the caption, "I'd do this in a heart beat! Who's with me!"

enter image description here

I was about to go balls to the walls and say, "I'm in! When and where??" But then I got to thinking, how fast would I be going when I hit the water? If I were going too fast, would it hurt me?

SO I was trying to figure this out, and I'm not very good at physics so I was wondering if you guys could help me out.

I estimate the guy is 90 kg in mass, the wire is angled pi/6 from the horizontal and he's about 50 meters above the water when he starts (all estimates...).

What is the formulas I need to figure out the speed the guy will be going once he hits the water? I know there's some calculus in there, and I'm pretty good at calculus.

1 Answers1

2

The only force which works is gravity$^1$. So, change in gravitational potential energy equals final Kinetic energy(assume initial is zero). $$mgh=mv^2/2$$ $$v=\sqrt{2gh}$$

here $h$ is vertical height traversed.See the velocity does not depend on angle of string, mass of body too..


Let's see the kinematics of body.

The length of string is $h cosec\theta$ ($\theta $ being angle with horizontal assumed $\pi/6$)

acceleration of body along the string=$g\sin\theta$

Now $\text{using} : v^2=u^2+2as$

$$v^2=0+2\times h cosec\theta\times g \sin\theta$$ $$v=\sqrt{2gh}$$


Working in differentials

for $v$ along the rope. $$dv/dt=v\dfrac{dv}{dx}=a$$ $$\int_0^{v_f} v.dv=\int_0^{hcosec\theta} a.dx=ax\Bigg|_0^{hsosec\theta}$$ $$\dfrac{v_f^2}2=gsin\theta.hcosec\theta \ \ ; \ \ a=gsin\theta$$


$1)$Assuming the pulley being used to slide to be friction less.Though not possible.Also the rope is assumed to be in-extensible and straight.
ABC
  • 2,469
  • 1
    Would the acceleration due to gravity be the same when going at an angle, though? I thought it would be a lot less than 9.81 m/s – OghmaOsiris May 09 '13 at 03:41
  • @OghmaOsiris See I worked out energies , the gravitational potential energy just change in vertical displacement.So, the work done is just $mgh_{\text{vertical}}$ – ABC May 09 '13 at 03:43
  • @OghmaOsiris I'll also work out kinematics if u say? – ABC May 09 '13 at 03:45
  • I'm just confused. When I work out your formula, I get ~31 m/s, but I know the velocity is constantly changing because of the acceleration. Am I not reading it right? – OghmaOsiris May 09 '13 at 03:48
  • @OghmaOsiris You are right!. $31.5m/s$ is the final velocity of body while crashing into water. – ABC May 09 '13 at 03:50
  • @007: I'm the guy who posted this on Facebook. Thanks for including two key points - that the answer assumes the line doesn't change and stays straight and that there would be friction. When growing up I had a zip line in my back yard that was 50' or longer. My Father was an engineer and we did all we could to make the line as tight as possible - and there are limits to that! It drastically effects the speed reachable.! – Tango May 09 '13 at 04:01
  • @Tango: Well i can show you why the string cannot be ever straight. – ABC May 09 '13 at 04:04
  • 1
    I was hoping there woul be some integration involved :(... I really like calculus lol. – OghmaOsiris May 09 '13 at 04:05
  • @OghmaOsiris: Why everyone see physics as full of math? It's a beautiful subject and this can be done without integration.;Well have you got the above solving? – ABC May 09 '13 at 04:07
  • @007: We knew it'd never be straight - but we did try to tighten it as much as we could! But, yes, I'd be interested in knowing why it wouldn't be - will it help if I post it as a question and reference this question from in it? – Tango May 09 '13 at 04:09
  • @Tango: Or just make a clear FBD. It will help a lot. – ABC May 09 '13 at 04:13
  • @Tango: Well you must ask a question . Let's see if anyone provides a even better answer. – ABC May 09 '13 at 04:22
  • 1
    @007 It looks like you integrated the velocity anyways. And I understand things better when put into the reference frame of math. The way you explained it isn't intuitive at all to me. It seemed more intuitive to integrate the velocity along a path. – OghmaOsiris May 09 '13 at 04:37
  • @OghmaOsiris: worked out maths too. – ABC May 09 '13 at 04:57
  • 1
    As an aside to physiology, be careful about hitting the water at that speed in that position. You could wind up forcing water to go where it really shouldn't... and can't... – DJohnM May 09 '13 at 06:32