I am learning about the 'bending' of a cyclist
I was told that the reaction force also 'tilts' when the cyclist is tilting (like in the figure), How is this possible? Isn't the reaction force always normal to the cyclist?
I am learning about the 'bending' of a cyclist
I was told that the reaction force also 'tilts' when the cyclist is tilting (like in the figure), How is this possible? Isn't the reaction force always normal to the cyclist?
I think $R$ is meant to be the force exerted by the cycle on the cyclist. The confusing thing about the diagram is that it draws the cyclist and cycle as one object, but then shows $R$, which is an internal force as far as this combined object is concerned. The diagram also omits the equal and opposite force $-R$ which the cyclist exerts on the cycle, the normal force that the road exerts on the cycle, and the cycle's weight.
It would be much clearer to draw two separate free-body diagrams - one for the cyclist, with forces $R$ from the cycle and the cyclist's weight $mg$; and one for the cycle with forces $-R$ from the cyclist, the cycle's weight $Mg$, friction from the road surface (horizontal) and the normal force from the road surface (vertical).
well it is just that reaction force is not always normal to the plane.Instead the normal force is always normal to the plane. The reaction force is composed of two parts
Most probably I didnt get your question. What do you mean by Reaction force is it Normal force. If yes then the normal always acts perpendicular it is just that we have spitted it into components of force (R cos-theta, R sin-theta) which can be compared to other components of force in the same direction(or same axis)