I couldn't find the value of resistivity of copper at 2.73K on google
-
Strongly related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/241274/ – Nilay Ghosh Aug 12 '19 at 03:48
-
I wanted to know the value – AJK Aug 16 '19 at 07:01
1 Answers
There is a problem with answering your question in that at such a low temperature the resistivity of copper is very much determined by the impurities and crystallographic defects eg dislocations, voids etc, which may be present.
At low temperatures it is the scattering of free electrons by impurities and crystallographic defects which determine the resistivity rather than the thermal excitation of the copper ions.
The parameter which is often measured is the residual resistance ratio $\dfrac{R_{\text{273 K}}}{R_{4.2\,\rm K}}$ which for fairly pure copper wire as used for telephone lines might be of the order of $100$.
Large single crystals of very pure copper can be produced with residual resistance ratios in the thousands.
I have annotated the graph to illustrate the non-linear logarithmic scale and how to find the resistivity of copper at $3\, \rm K$.
- 95,680
-
so it's impossible to use copper at any temperature around 3k as a conductor – AJK Aug 08 '19 at 19:16
-
1@AJK That is not what I wrote. From the graph you can get an estimate of the resistivity of “ordinary” copper at around $3,\rm K$. At this temperature the copper is a much better conductor of electricity than at room temperature. – Farcher Aug 08 '19 at 19:19
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
-
1
-
5Do you know what a logarithmic axis is? Both axes in the graph are logarithmic, which makes it “log-log”. – G. Smith Aug 08 '19 at 20:12
-
Where did you find this graph? I never saw a log scale with 3/30/300 as its 'major' tics before. Sure it works, but - WHY? – asdfex Aug 09 '19 at 09:17
-
@asdfex probably because there's no data for <=3 so it would just be a huge waste of space – OrangeDog Aug 09 '19 at 10:20
-
-
All SE posts are version controlled, so please do not make your post look like a revision table, instead just seamlessly integrate the new material into the post. There is an edit history button at the bottom of the post for those interested in seeing what changed. – Kyle Kanos Aug 13 '19 at 11:54
-
@KyleKanos Thanks for the reply. I will amend my answers as I come across them. – Farcher Aug 13 '19 at 12:27

