Questions tagged [virtue-ethics]

Aristotle fathered virtue ethics, which has wide spread adoption, historically. The ethical view takes value in either the actions in themselves (Deontology) or the consequences of the act (consequentialism) based upon the character of the individual.

Aristotle fathered virtue ethics, through the golden mean, which has wide spread adoption, historically. The ethical view takes value in the character of the individual based upon acts themselves (Deontology) or the consequences of the act (consequentialism). Aristotle observed, in Nicomachean Ethics, that training is necessary, as with a child, to learn good and evil. Once this division is solid a good person will act instinctually on good behavior based on good intentions. Stumbling is possible, but a good person is good because of the nature in their intentions, not because of solitary actions which may fall out of line with the overall.

92 questions
7
votes
2 answers

Is Virtue Ethics based on self-interest?

I hope this question makes sense, but is it correct to say that virtue ethics accounts are based on self-interest? If virtue ethics are concerned with achieving a good life, is it possible for them not make ethical action based on the individual's…
flen
  • 203
  • 1
  • 3
2
votes
2 answers

Do ascriptions of vice and virtue, etc., to someone or their character really not "blame" them?

Do ascriptions of vice and virtue, etc., to someone or their character really not "blame" them? I have seen it said that virtue ethics, which must maintain 'vice' at least to actions, does not "blame" or "condemn" people. But in what way is someone…
user64279
1
vote
0 answers

What is Williams' "reflexively deformed" virtue, what does it mean?

What is Williams' "reflexively deformed" virtue, what does it mean? I came across that phrase trying to find out if, for Williams, integrity is unequivocally no virtue and just a quality of character. Is that a certainty, that his "integrity" is no…
user65994
1
vote
1 answer

Do we need 'obligation' for 'impermissible'?

Apparently, virtue ethicists don't have 'obligation'. I cannot practically tell the difference between an impermissible action which is due to an "obligation" to another person and one due to my character. Indeed, I am unsure whether "everything is…
user64154
1
vote
3 answers

Is it possible that we have a branch of philosophy called philosophical finance in the future?

Some philosopher argue that philosopher should not be associated with money. Could a philosopher win a argument and get a prize from a casino virtually in a computer game called philosophical finance in the future? Please write your answer in a…
Victor
  • 271
  • 1
  • 10
1
vote
0 answers

Does anyone say that the virtue of the person we wrongly attack etc. reflects badly on us?

Does anyone say that the virtue of the person we wrongly attack etc. reflects badly on us? Let me explain... ordinarily, by which I mean non-philosophers and the like, we might feel worse about wrongly defaming or destroying someone of high status.…
user66697
  • 639
  • 11
1
vote
0 answers

When something is morally permitted and has more utility for you, should it come down to virtue whether or not you do it?

When something is morally permitted and has more utility for you, should it come down to virtue whether or not you do it? I'm thinking yes, and obviously so, but it's weird that it would be obvious. Take as an example safely becoming an escort to…
user70563
0
votes
2 answers

What is the difference between ideal and success?

Someone said that ideal is when everything is perfect, but success is when you go from complete catastrophe to something workable. Because almost nothing in this world is ideal except for mathematics, it would seem that success is the greater…
Fomalhaut
  • 579
  • 2
  • 9