In Islamic philosophy, those who die are divided into those who die in sleep and those who do not die in sleep. The following link is the relevant question: Sleep and Death
The truth is that if a person is sleep-deprived, it is a mortal who dies. Sleep is a state of unbusyness that reorganizes the brain's working order.
In another possibility, if a person is sleep-deprived, he gets as far away as possible from the causes that lead it to death (Az-Zumar 42). If this is true, then there must be reasons that do not put people to sleep. Is there a threshold for human tolerance for these assumptions, or are people unable to distinguish between sleep and death because they are frightened by death? After all, it is not possible to predict exactly when death will come. Can the person who does not die without sleeping be proof, or is it just fallacy?
Of course, Islam, like some religions, contains extraordinary descriptions. However, if it is not possible to encounter such an extraordinary phenomenon on behalf of our species, given the human condition, does this mean that it may be necessary to torture people in order to isolate them from sleep at the expense of killing? Or what were people overlooking in this status?
Why do Muslims discount a person's metabolic state as a trump card to others when they wake up close to sunrise and have a very limited sleep time? Is it for everytime?
While Islamophobia is on the rise, if the negation of the Qur'an is not enough to prevent vandalism, how ethical is it? I think there will be no problem here as long as we deal with this issue openly and without being sharp-tongued.