5

I found a (seemingly) perfectly good slice of pizza in the trash. I became curious. So I asked both children if they did it. Both denied it. There is one other adult in the house. After questioning, I eliminated the other adult as a suspect. I know I did not do it (because it is not the type of thing I would do and I'm 99.9% certain I would remember doing it if I had). So that leaves two remaining suspects. Both children. (Ages 10 and 13). Both deny doing it.

Obviously, my concern here is not over the pizza itself but over the fact that someone is clearly lying to me. I questioned both suspects separately, then together, then separately again for approximately 30 minutes hoping one would "break" and confess. Neither did. I suspect one more than the other (call it 80-20) based on intuition and prior history (he lied last year about homework). But he vehemently denies throwing away the pizza to the end; neither suspect cracked an inch.

Also, a goal here is a learning experience. For example, there might come a time in the future when I have to determine which child is lying to me. So, I am searching for any "tells" or other behavior patterns that might be helpful in the future as well.

Has anyone else experienced a situation like this before? If so, how did you handle it and what was the outcome? Other ideas and/or advice is also welcome.

Mowzer
  • 342
  • 2
  • 10
  • Have you tried questioning them separately? – Jax Oct 16 '16 at 23:30
  • What ages are them? – Diego Sánchez Oct 17 '16 at 15:43
  • @DiegoSánchez: ages 10 and 13 – Mowzer Oct 17 '16 at 16:53
  • 1
    Offer one of them a pizza slice to rat the other one out. The one who can be bought in such a manner is not someone who would throw out a pizza slice. – PoloHoleSet Oct 17 '16 at 17:56
  • As long as your doing police-style interrogations, I ran into a retired cold-case detective the other day who said that when they questioned people separately, they'd tell each of them that they had just been talking with the other, and that he'd completely spilled the beans. That person would give some more information, and then they'd take that info to the other person, tell him his partner told them blank (which is true), scare the actual heck out of him, get more info, rinse, repeat. lol, don't try this at home... – General Nuisance Oct 20 '16 at 14:14
  • "you both are grounded if no-one breaks the silence" may work. And do so if silence is still not broken.(But on the outside just do it for little time like for 2-hrs or something and observe) this may get you truth. – Mukul Kumar Nov 04 '16 at 18:51

2 Answers2

13

The reason children lie is generally that they fear punishment. One way of getting the truth which I've used is to make it clear that no punishment is in the offing. In this case, you could say that there's nothing wrong with putting the pizza in the trash, but you just wanted to know why it was done - not enough refrigerator space, yucky pizza, or whatever - since that might affect what you do about it, such as whether to clean out the refrigerator or to order from a different pizza provider or order something other than pizza next time.

Warren Dew
  • 2,643
  • 11
  • 20
  • 2
    +1. Half the time, if you phrase the question as an open "Why did this happen?" instead of an accusing "Who did this?" they will answer truthfully immediately, because they're not afraid of what happens when they answer. (Assuming you don't teach them that they get punished for answering the open question honestly.) – Erik Oct 17 '16 at 14:39
  • 3
    @Erik - that can possibly work, as long as the phrase "the f--k" is not between "why" and "did".... – PoloHoleSet Oct 17 '16 at 17:58
-2

I am not sure if the following is a good idea but I have tried it in the past: declare martial law and have them both grounded, the one who will take it easily is the guilty one. The innocent one will try to resist as he/she has done nothing wrong.

Ulkoma
  • 1,994
  • 4
  • 21
  • 34