20

Here is a scary scenario:

Let's say you were in a ship or submarine that sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

No scuba gear, no oxygen tank, nothing.

The depth of the ocean is such that nitrogen levels will affect you significantly if you rapidly rise up to the surface.

Let's say you're 100 feet+ below the surface, no Mariana Trench type deal, but shallow enough to know that you can make it to the top in one breath.

You're able to find an area in the ship that has a pocket of air but know that it won't last long, you take your chances, explore, and find a way out.

You have no other choice but to escape and swim to the surface.

QUESTION

You need to swim as fast as you can to the surface, but know that if you go up too fast, you might pass out or something.

What are your options here for best chance of survival?

mph85
  • 781
  • 1
  • 6
  • 12
  • 7
    Even though the question describes a hypothetical and unlikely situation I think it has some merits as it is somewhat relevant for SCUBA diving. Answer below. – fgysin Nov 05 '19 at 07:10
  • As @fgysin says this just defines an emergency uncontrolled scuba ascent (swimming or buoyant) - you will need a hyperbaric chamber afterwards for oxygen therapy. - see DAN - https://www.diversalertnetwork.org/health/alertdiver/theory-into-practicebremergency-ascents-managing-the-risks – Aravona Nov 05 '19 at 10:29
  • However unlikely and hypothetical the situation may be, it's not impossible and it is an answerable question, not just to discussed. – mph85 Nov 05 '19 at 14:01
  • 1
    https://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/man-survived-days-shipwreck-vows-return-sea-article-1.1545568 – mph85 Nov 05 '19 at 14:01
  • 1
    At plus 100 feet you die when you open the door. – Mazura Nov 06 '19 at 06:59
  • @Mazura instantaneously? and im not being sarcastic. – mph85 Nov 06 '19 at 07:58
  • 1
    I believe this is actually part of the training process for UK submariners, and it's quite dangerous even in a controlled environment with safety divers on standby. – pjc50 Nov 06 '19 at 10:24
  • 2
    100ft is survivable, but the chances are very, very slim if you don't have the proper training. – Mast Nov 06 '19 at 14:02
  • 1
    Actaully, if you find a good bubble, you could just wait for rescuers. This guy was rescued after 60 hours at 30m depth: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-25205914/moment-divers-found-man-trapped-alive-in-sunken-ship – Ivana Nov 06 '19 at 14:37
  • 3
    Are there not actual historic incidents when submarines had to be evacuated? – Peter - Reinstate Monica Nov 06 '19 at 16:06
  • 1
    @mph85 - Correction: you cannot open the door because (by design, I'd assume) they open outward. You wait to be rescued by somebody other than the people unwilling to admit they have a problem... i.e., Kursk. There are however escape hatches, but I'm unclear to their available fail safe use on a broken sub (pressure has to equalize by using... valves?). - Even if you could open it, 'sudden compression' is proving hard to research. – Mazura Nov 07 '19 at 01:13

4 Answers4

30

Even though the question describes a hypothetical and unlikely situation I think it has some merits as it is somewhat relevant for SCUBA diving also: it describes an emergency uncontrolled SCUBA ascent (swimming or buoyant).

Note that the answer below assumes an absolute emergency only that requires an immediate no-air ascent. As in, you either reach the surface now or you will drown, so all the entailed risks are still a better alternative. Don't try this while SCUBA diving - follow your guide / dive plan!

Also check this guide about managing risks in emergency SCUBA ascents.


Nitrogen levels will only be a problem if there is actually a some amount of nitrogen dissolved in your blood. This will happen over time - and faster the higher the pressure - so your best bet is certainly to not stay in the pressurised zone (i.e. the sunken ship / air pocket / deep water) at the bottom, but escape immediately and ascend at a rate of about 20m/60ft per minute.

If you, for example, end up at 30m depth due to some freak accident and immediately surface again it should theoretically be somewhat ok to resurface without any stops, as you didn't spend a long enough time at depth for significant build-up of nitrogen in the blood. This means that the risk of decompression sickness is not big, but you should not rely on this.

Second important thing: when diving up you'll have to constantly breathe out a (small) amount of air. If you're not doing that the air in your lungs will expand and the resulting pressure will rupture lung cells - this can be deadly! So even if you only have one precious breath of air, breathe out constantly when surfacing. Due to the pressure reducing during the ascent the air in your lungs will actually expand and it will thus not feel like you're "running out of air". (I can't stress the importance of this enough. During SCUBA diving certifications you learn that even an ascent of a couple of meters while holding your breath can damage your lungs seriously.)

Obviously in such an emergency it is also important to make sure that the dive up will be as easy and unhindered as possible: leave everything behind that will slow you or pull you down, drop any diving weights, clothes, ... etc.

Once on the surface seek medical attention immediately. You are at high risk of decompression sickness and will likely need treatment in a hyperbaric chamber. Also get out of the water immediately if you can, as you are at risk of becoming unconscious if deco sickness hits you.

fgysin
  • 12,957
  • 1
  • 41
  • 69
  • Once you reach the surface, assuming you have any strength left and help is coming, would it be useful to take a few deep dives for a few seconds each in order to provide a makeshift hyperbaric chamber? – Ray Butterworth Nov 05 '19 at 14:21
  • 16
    @RayButterworth that would be just insane. You'd have to get back to the original depth, and you'd risk passing out from exhaustion and/or a nitrogen bubble getting into just the wrong spot in your brain. Scuba gear will reduce exhaustion greatly but do nothing about the risk of passing out (you'll lose the mouthpiece). A diving buddy will reduce both risks. The basic problem is that you'll still be under stress, which means more mistakes, and you don't have much margin for mistakes while underwater. – toolforger Nov 05 '19 at 15:06
  • @toolforger is right, re-diving with nitrogen build up usually ends up increasing the nitrogen - you need oxygen at a higher % - preferably 100% - to do what's called 'rapid off-gassing' – Aravona Nov 05 '19 at 15:38
  • @RayButterworth - As noted, no. Instead, you're way better off using that energy to call for help. Then when help arrives, get medical attention ASAP! Let's say you did do what you suggested, you'd still need to get the same medical attention as if you didn't so there's no real benefit. – BruceWayne Nov 05 '19 at 16:05
  • The breathe out continuously while ascending has been stuck in my head ever since reading a book as a kid: https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/robb-white-3/the-survivor-9/ One of the guys actually doesn't make it because he doesn't think he needs to breathe out while they escape the sub. It's cool to hear this is realistic... Great read, highly recommend btw – sǝɯɐſ Nov 05 '19 at 16:46
  • I read on on the Wikipedia page about Decompression sickness that divers typically limit ascent rates to less than 10 meters per minute. Could perhaps an experienced diver in this situation benefit from trying to make a 1 minute "decompression stop" every 10 meter? Or would the risks outweigh the benefits? – jkej Nov 05 '19 at 19:51
  • 10
    Submarines (the only situation where I think this could realistically happen) are kept at normal atmospheric pressure. Without the extra dissolved nitrogen from breathing high pressure air, I don't think there's any risk of decompression sickness, although I'm not 100% certain. – mbrig Nov 05 '19 at 20:07
  • @mbrig - agreed. The problem is that you die when you exit the sub. "Past depths of about 99 feet -- 4 atmospheres of pressure -- reinforced atmospheric suits are necessary." – classroom.synonym.com. The Kursk was at -354 feet... – Mazura Nov 06 '19 at 06:57
  • @mbrig - at some point you'll have to leave the sub and you will end up in a high pressure zone (either through air lock or whatever...). If you then immediately dive up the nitrogen buildup could indeed be minimal and the risk of deco sickness low. However, you'll still spend some time in the high pressure zone, so seek medical attention anyway. – fgysin Nov 06 '19 at 08:01
  • 2
    @jkej - yes. But those limits are for normal non-emergency situations. You will hardly have the time for safety stops while ascending with a single breath of air (and without diving equipment it would also be very hard to even stay at a certain depth). – fgysin Nov 06 '19 at 08:03
  • @fgysin But then you are in a freediving-like situation which is quite different from scuba diving. – Vladimir F Героям слава Nov 06 '19 at 13:44
  • @VladimirF, my understanding of freediving is that you are generally not diving deep/long enough for deco sickness to become an issue. In an emergency case as described (SCUBA no-air assent, or you escaping from an air pocket of a sunken vessel) you will likely have spent some time at depth, which could make deco sickness an issue. – fgysin Nov 06 '19 at 14:27
  • @fgysin Yes, if you spend some time in a diving bell you certainly can get the decompression disease as the workers in caissons used to get. – Vladimir F Героям слава Nov 06 '19 at 14:41
  • @Mazura That statement about "reinforced atmospheric suits" in that reference is wrong. Free divers routinely go to depths far lower than 100ft. The current absolute world record stands at +800ft! https://www.impulseadventure.com/freedive/world-record.html – user2705196 Nov 06 '19 at 15:09
  • Free diving is different as you do not breathe in and out at depth - when you scuba dive your lung size changes with pressure, when you go up you must keep breathing as otherwise you can get lung overexpansion injuries. From depth in a pressurised container assuming no leaks, you should be at a normal lung capacity. Also the freediving record goes over 200m so free-diving information is relevant. Free divers however due to holding their breath at the surface can rapid ascend more than 9m per minute without issues. – Aravona Nov 06 '19 at 15:52
  • 1
    The ascent rate of 20 m/min is for diving. One thing that's more similar to escaping a sunken vessel than diving is escaping a sunken submarine. The military designs submarine escape gear for an ascent rate of about 80 m/min, and faster is better (it's hard to overcome the drag). – Therac Nov 06 '19 at 16:42
24

First and foremost: Don't Panic

At 30m, you'll be fine if you can free yourself within about 20 minutes and know what you're doing. That being said, there is a good chance you won't know your exact depth, so the sooner the better is going to be your guiding principle. (At 40m, your time drops to 8 minutes. At 20m, you have 45 minutes.)

PADI and NAUI both publish dive tables and at 30m, they give you 20 minutes and 22 minutes, respectively, before you hit the no-decompression limit.

Note: these are not hard do or die limits and likely include some safety margin. Risk will increase as time increases.

What you'd want to do is a CESA, a Controlled Emergency Swimming Ascent where you try to rise at around 60ft/min (1ft/sec) while constantly exhaling. Note from 30m this should take about 100 seconds. Do not ascend "as rapidly as possible".

Constantly exhaling may seem counter-intuitive but is absolutely necessary to avoid injury. At 30m, the air in your lungs is at 4 atmospheres, which means it'll expand to 4 times the volume if you try and hold your breath and it will rupture your lungs. From first hand experience practicing CESAs, the feeling is strange but it's necessary and you won't run out of air. You will be blowing bubbles the entire way. The normal advice for divers is to say "ahh" the entire way up, because that's how you ensure you didn't accidentally start holding your breath.

Contrary to other answers, do not hyperventilate, as it will only increase your chances of drowning:

As the diver ascends [from 30m] hydrostatic pressure is reduced fourfold with a fourfold reduction in oxygen tensions in alveolar gas, arterial blood, and tissues. The rapidly falling cerebral oxygen pressure may be inadequate for consciousness to be maintained and the diver could drown during ascent.

The danger of hyperventilation applies to all breath hold divers, including snorkel divers and people swimming lengths underwater in pools. The reduction in oxygen pressure when coming to the surface from the bottom of a 2 m deep pool can be enough to cause unconsciousness, and some children have died this way.

You won't feel the need to breathe while ascending, because you will have essentially full lungs the entire trip to the surface. Again, you'll be letting excess air out the whole way to the surface. Yes, it will seem like it is taking a long time and it should.

TemporalWolf
  • 341
  • 1
  • 4
  • 3
    +1. This is the only correct answer so far. The others are hypotheses from non-divers. This is fact, with decades of diving science behind it to back it up, and is an essential part of basic training for all divers. One further thing to note though for non-divers - it's a scary and unfamiliar feeling. The chances of a non-diver being able to pull it off under pressure without training are lower - more likely, sadly, they'll either panic on the way up and drown, hold their breath and rupture their lungs, or go too fast and get the bends. – Graham Nov 06 '19 at 13:35
  • 2
    Shouldn't the situation in a sinking ship be rather similar to freediving instead of scuba diving? – Vladimir F Героям слава Nov 06 '19 at 13:42
  • @Graham I teach diving (not full-time) and I'd rather do a buoyant ascent in this scenario, because I don't have fins. CESA is very easy with fins, starting on a full breath of compressed air. It's less so with bare feet. – Therac Nov 06 '19 at 15:49
  • @Therac Most people are naturally buoyant, doubly so with full lungs, so in this case the CESA would be buoyant. Without all the weights and scuba equipment a slow ascent is not physically challenging. I'd be much more worried about someone (especially untrained) wasting all their energy trying to frantically swim up rather than allowing physics to take its course and aiming for an easy to moderate assist. They aren't going to have a depth gauge, so they won't know their ascent rate and going into it expecting it to take some time may stave off panic. Slow is smooth, smooth is fast. – TemporalWolf Nov 06 '19 at 19:19
  • @TemporalWolf Full lungs are hardly a given on a sunken ship, and the buoyancy provided is too small for a fast ascent. That said, a buoyant ascent is exactly what I'm suggesting, here and in the answer. IF AND ONLY IF you can't get good speed with buoyancy, fast is fast. The stress levels during such an incident will make you consume oxygen at maximum possible rate, whether you're swimming as fast as you can or not. – Therac Nov 06 '19 at 19:22
  • I was told in my PADI course to go up slightly slower than my bubbles. Is this pertinent in this situation? – ab2 Nov 06 '19 at 20:23
  • @Therac I'm not convinced, but unfortunately I don't live in the tropics anymore. If I did, I'd just add this to my weekend dive. Good practice for a gear entanglement self-rescue. – TemporalWolf Nov 06 '19 at 20:24
  • 1
    @TemporalWolf I've done CESA from 40m and it's barely an effort. At the same time, I feel quite out of breath at the end of a 25m underwater swim without fins. The difference in power efficiency for fins and nothing is huge. My experience at pool skin diving is that more power equals a longer swim; you run out of oxygen in about the same amount of time. – Therac Nov 06 '19 at 20:38
  • @Therac My personal diving experience and military training, to include survival swimming in combat boots, incline me to disagree. I'd posit the top danger in this situation is panic, to which "swim to the surface as fast as you can" seems like it may make things worse, not better. That being said, the advice to grab any available buoyant object is really good either way, as it'll reduce the effort and increase speed, both of which will help you. – TemporalWolf Nov 06 '19 at 21:07
  • @ab2ReinstateMonicaNow I've used bubbles for orientation before: they point the way up, so following them to the surface is not a bad idea, but I probably wouldn't try to slow myself down to try to stay under them. – TemporalWolf Nov 06 '19 at 21:18
  • Would going from the controlled atmosphere of a submarine to the atmospheric pressure at 30m be an issue? – sfors says reinstate Monica Nov 06 '19 at 23:14
  • What little experience I have with injury-related stress involved "autopilot mode" rather than panic. Anyway, I feel your answer focuses way too much on a SCUBA scenario. In a non-SCUBA scenario, most dive training except for keeping the airway open goes out the window. Not struggling beyond your ability and deliberately limiting your ascent speed isn't the same thing. – Therac Nov 07 '19 at 04:17
  • 1
    @sfors I don't have any personal experience with that, so I asked my submariner friend. According to his training with the US Navy, the answer is it won't be much of an issue. If there are escape suits use them, but you can survive without one. He did caution that it's very hard to tell whether or not the sub is moving, so don't abandon ship until you're sure it's actually unrecoverable/sunk. This is largely consistent with information I have found online – TemporalWolf Nov 07 '19 at 19:20
9

Escaping a sunken ship or submarine has some similarities to an emergency ascent in the course of SCUBA diving, but it's not identical to it.

First the differences:

  1. You don't have fins. Without fins, you cannot swim as fast and as efficiently. Fins allow you to limit oxygen consumption by using efficiency-optimized leg muscles. Swimming with arms and feet takes far more energy for less speed. A 100 ft swim is still manageable, but now it depends a lot on your physical (and mental) condition.

  2. You've only been under pressure for a short time. Otherwise, it's almost certain that you would have already drowned. Surface ships can trap pockets of air, but generally they fill up with water quite thoroughly when they sink. Nitrogen loading is determined by time*pressure, not just pressure, and won't generally be a concern.

  3. Submarines are equipped with emergency escape gear. The gear comprises a basic airtight suit with a compressed gas bottle (and a pressure relief valve) to fill it up and produce an extremely rapid buoyant ascent. This allows for ascents from 500+ feet.

Note that submarines also sink differently from surface ships. A ship will equalize to ambient pressure once underwater, as nothing inside it can resist the pressure difference. A submarine will maintain some compartments at near-atmospheric pressure. This delays any nitrogen loading before you actually exit the sub.

Since submarine escape gear supplies one with compressed air, allowing plenty of time for the ascent, DCS is again a concern. In that case, DCS is avoided by ascending as fast as possible - about 80 m/min, 4-8 times faster than when diving - to minimize the amount of time spent of high pressure. The same feat, going fast (in both directions), is what allows freedivers to dive as deep as 100-200 m and come back up without need for spending time in deco.

One thing that's more similar to escaping a sunken submarine than any kind of diving is escaping a sunken submarine. All boat crews and even contractors that go out to sea trials generally receive submarine escape training specific to the boat they're on and the gear it's got, so you'd follow that training.

The similarities include:

  • Lung overexpansion injuries are possible with even small amounts of compressed air. You need to keep your airway open (exhale). As the water is filling up your vessel, it's equalizing its internal pressure up to the higher ambient pressure. So, if you've taken any breaths on the bottom, you've breathed in compressed air.

  • Passing out is caused by hypoxia, not by ascent speed. Hyperventilation is useless in a survival situation, as it simply tricks your body into delaying the urge to breathe. That's not needed, as exhaling during the ascent will already do the job of controlling your breathing. Additionally, a dangerously high blood level of CO2 (hypercapnia) takes much longer to reach than a dangerously low blood level of oxygen (hypoxia).

  • In a scenario less likely IRL (but more likely in a movie), with a large vessel where you have managed to survive on large pockets of air, that air has been compressed to ambient pressure. That turns it into a SCUBA-like scenario where eventual DCS is possible. However, you cannot deco without breathing gas, so there's no choice about it.

In conclusion, your top priority is to reach the surface on your remaining blood oxygen. Hypoxia leads to loss of consciousness, which leads to drowning.

Your second priority, if you're starting the escape on a full breath, is avoiding lung overexpansion injuries by keeping your airway open. Lung overexpansion injuries have a lower fatality rate than drowning.

Avoiding DCS is not a priority at all, because you don't have a compressed air source to buy a meaningful amount of time for deco. Slowing down your ascent so little that you can still do it on one breath will do nothing for you, except increase the risk of failure and drowning. Fortunately, over 90% of DCS cases are survivable.

All in all, you want to get the best ratio of ascent rate to oxygen use rate.

If possible, grab any available buoyant object, because that allows you to ascent with minimal effort.

Absent that, get out and swim up. If you don't get up to speed with buoyancy and light kicks, active swimming will have you use up your blood oxygen at maximum possible rate. In that event, you might as well use your muscles' anaerobic energy stores. Practically, at that stage, you won't be thinking about it anyway.

Therac
  • 191
  • 1
  • 5
  • Step one: find, and understand how to operate, the escape hatch - the others you cannot open under pressure. 2: find and don the suit "to keep the escapee dry and protected from cold shock during ascent, and to provide buoyancy, freeboard, and thermal insulation at the surface." - "*Reduced* risk of decompression sickness, oxygen toxicity, carbon dioxide toxicity and nitrogen narcosis is dependent on a relatively high rate of pressurization and ejection from the escape lock, as all of these hazards are time-dependent." – Mazura Nov 07 '19 at 01:23
1

The other answers compare the situation to those where a SCUBA diver has to ascend immediately due to gear malfunction. Since you specifically ask about escaping from a sunken ship/submarine, I wanted to point to references explicitly stating that the same techniques are (or were) used for submarine escape. An article in the Journal of Military and Veterans Health discusses the history of submarine escape:

[Breathing apparatus] escape systems remained prevalent until 1946 when the Royal Navy held an inquiry into escape from sunken submarines. The inquiry found no difference in survival rate between those who used a DSEA [Davis Submarine Escape Apparatus, a breathing apparatus]to escape and those that did so unaided.2 As a result the DSEA was replaced with the ‘free ascent’ or ‘blow and go’ technique. Free ascent involved the crew member beginning the ascent with compressed air in their lungs. During the ascent the submariner breathed out at a controlled rate, allowing air to escape. This was a continual process, as the air expanded in the lungs due the decreasing pressure experienced en route to the surface. To limit the chance of being affected by decompression sickness, the escapee would use the bubbles of expelled air to judge the ascent by staying behind the smaller bubbles. To aid in the escape, a crew member might also use a life jacket or buoyant ring. In this case the rate of ascent was more rapid, which required the submariner to blow more rapidly throughout the journey to the surface. Buoyancy assisted free ascent continues to be practiced by Royal Australian Navy (RAN) submariners at the Submarine Escape and Rescue Centre at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia.

So the advice and techniques talked about for SCUBA emergencies were widely practiced for submarine escape, and are almost certainly the best bet in the absence of the one-person escape suits that became available later.

DJClayworth
  • 1,801
  • 13
  • 23
  • My father was a Frogman back in the early Underwater Demolition Team days. Growing up he would always talk about staying just behind the bubbles during such an ascent. – That Idiot Nov 12 '19 at 19:18