3

How do you functionally describe the I-III-VI(7) progression, when used as a substitute for I-V-vi?

The bridge goes ii-V / I-V-vi / in the first two lines, then ii-V / I-III-VI(7), resolving to ii-V-I.

I almost feels like a temporary excursion into ii minor or a modal variation, but I'm sure there's a clearer way to explain it.

Paul F
  • 31
  • 1

1 Answers1

3

I think this is the chart...

| ii V | I  V  vi  |
| ii V | I III VI7 |
| ii V | I

...I'm not exactly sure of your barlines.

The part I V vi can be called a deceptive progression.

The part I-III-VI(7) I think you mean in F major the chord would be F A D7

Functionally I think you could just say I V/vi V7/ii. After the tonic chord it's like the beginning of a circle of fifths of dominants. Roots descending by 5th to ii. So then the chart could be analyzed like this...

| ii V | I   V    vi  |
| ii V | I V/vi V7/ii |
| ii V | I

In F major the named chords are...

| Gm C | F C Dm |
| Gm C | F A D7 |
| Gm C | F

The last five chords are a long segment of the circle of fifths.

We can list out just the roots with Roman numerals and letters...

F    Bb   E    A    D    G    C    F
I    IV   viio iii  vi   ii   V    I

The diatonic chord qualities are...

F    Bb   Edim Am   Dm   Gm   C    F
I    IV   viio iii  vi   ii   V    I

Excepting IV and viio it totally fine to modify the other chord to become either major triads or dominant seventh chords as long as the function as secondary dominants. I put the sevenths in parenthesis to show it is optional without changing the functional harmony. I also used both kinds of Roman numerals...

F      Bb     Edim   A(7)   D(7)   G(7)   C(7)   F
I      IV     viio   V/vi   V/ii   V/V    V      I
I      IV     viio   III(7) VI(7)  II(7)  V(7)   I

...you can use other combinations of minor chords versus major/dominant sevenths in that part of the circle of fifths from iii to I. The important thing is the roots descending by perfect fifths.

So, the final part of your piece plays the full circle of fifths using a few secondary domiants but omitting the IV and viio chords.

Michael Curtis
  • 56,724
  • 2
  • 49
  • 154
  • Ha, I should have provided a key. I'm playing it in F, and transposing your comment! – Paul F May 15 '19 at 18:02
  • The song is in F. The bridge starts on Gm:

    Gm C F C Dm Gm C F A D7 Gm C F

    – Paul F May 15 '19 at 18:06
  • sorry, the line breaks didn't hold in that comment – Paul F May 15 '19 at 18:07
  • Gm C / F C Dm / Gm C / F A D7 / Gm C / F – Paul F May 15 '19 at 18:08
  • @PaulF, I made an edit re. key of F and with the bridge parts. If my bar lines are problematic can you edit your answer to give the exact bars? – Michael Curtis May 15 '19 at 18:38
  • I understand the deceptive progression, yes. And you got the bar lines right, and the chords in F. What confuses me is my misunderstanding of the descending circle of fifths. A is the dominant of D, which is Dm, vi, in F. D7 is the dominant of G, which is Gm, ii, in F. They both look ascending to me. Can you tell me what we are descending from? – Paul F May 15 '19 at 22:52
  • This part... A D7 / Gm C / F ...you are descending chord roots from A to F by desc. 5ths. I made another edit stepping through the diatonic and chromatic possibilities on those roots. – Michael Curtis May 15 '19 at 23:24