37

From a Reuters article:

On Wednesday, [Newmont Mining Corp] reported gold reserves of 68.5 million ounces for 2017, unchanged from 2016, as it replaced reserves through exploration, projects, revisions and acquisitions.

68,500,000 ounces divided by 35,274 (metric ton conversion from ounces) equals over 1,900 metric tons. That can't be possible, as that's in the billions of dollars and would imply the company is underpriced.

What is "gold reserves" on a balance sheet in this case defined as?

blahdiblah
  • 277
  • 1
  • 5
Ms Jackson
  • 1,829
  • 1
  • 14
  • 17
  • 18
    How would that imply the company is underpriced? You can't use the price of extracted, purified gold and use it as the price for unmined gold sitting in the ground. Some of that gold likely costs more to mine than it's worth. – David Schwartz Feb 26 '18 at 21:07
  • 17
    @DavidSchwartz I'm pretty sure that is the essence of the OP's confusion. – Rupert Morrish Feb 26 '18 at 21:09
  • 2
    Good point on the underpriced comment. But that's more gold than many countries have - that seems enormous. If someone was to say "That's in-ground gold only, and not something they are currently storing" I'd understand how it's feasible more as that would be considered gold to be mined in the future not gold currently in storage that we've already mined. – Ms Jackson Feb 26 '18 at 21:09
  • 4
    Also, the company is valued in the billions of dollars. The have over 3 billion dollars just in cash. – David Schwartz Feb 26 '18 at 21:16
  • 7
    it's a specific term in the gold mining business.' – Fattie Feb 26 '18 at 22:11
  • You should include relevant information, such as the name of the company, in your question, rather than just providing a link. – Acccumulation Feb 26 '18 at 23:27
  • 1
    Worth noting the "troy ounce" often used in bullion is about 10% more mass than an avoidrupois ounce - so depending on which units they used, that could be +/- 10% of what you have in mind. 32150 troy ounces per metric ton – user662852 Feb 27 '18 at 01:28
  • 1
    The conversion factor is wrong, and also unnecessary. Gold prices are in terms of troy ounces. – Jasper Feb 27 '18 at 05:56
  • @Fattie Well, in the minerals/mining/oil/gas business in general. – David Richerby Feb 27 '18 at 09:32
  • right on, @DavidRicherby – Fattie Feb 27 '18 at 11:14
  • 1
    @DavidSchwartz - sure, they have a market capitalisation of $20B, but that much gold if they actually had it in hand would be worth over $90B. – Jules Feb 27 '18 at 14:03
  • 1
    @Jules Yeah, even if gold falls 50%, if they really have as much gold as they claim, they'd be underpriced. They also mine copper and silver - this is just their "gold reserves." – Ms Jackson Feb 27 '18 at 17:31
  • 3
    @MsJackson Mining is a value-added operation. If they haven't mined the gold yet, they cannot rightfully assign it a value as if they have. Without knowing how much it does cost them to extract it; they cannot rightfully give it the same value as gold which has had value added by being extracted from the ground so that it can be used. – JMac Feb 27 '18 at 18:24

2 Answers2

69

For gold mining companies, the amount of gold that the company has access to but has not yet been mined is accounted for in "reserves". The company can claim a percentage of those reserves as assets, but must spend money to mine them. That is why the market value of those reserves is not entirely reflected in the value of the company. The actual value must be reduced by the cost of extraction, and adjusted for the possibility that there isn't actually that much gold underground.

if they really have as much gold as they claim, they'd be underpriced.

Suppose your neighbors have a suitcase with $1 million buried in their backyard. You estimate that it would cost $400,000 to dig up the suitcase. What would you say their property is worth? Would you say that it's underpriced if it's valued at $600,000, even though there's $1 million in the backyard?

D Stanley
  • 133,791
  • 19
  • 313
  • 372
  • 2
    Does 'access' encompass reserves that the company owns, or all reserves everywhere that the company is aware of and could feasibly lease from the owner? – Tom W Feb 27 '18 at 09:18
  • 9
    @TomW I'm pretty sure it's only stuff that they have actual permission to mine. – David Richerby Feb 27 '18 at 09:35
  • 2
    See also "oil reserves" vs "oil resources" - the former is those that can sensibly be recovered, the latter is all that the owner is aware of. – pjc50 Feb 27 '18 at 13:31
  • @TomW The former - only minerals that the company has a legal right to mine ,whether by owning the land or active leases. – D Stanley Feb 27 '18 at 14:09
  • Noting also that the price of the reserves reflects the percentage chance that the gold seams may turn out to be less valuable than anticipated. They're rarely more valuable. – Valorum Feb 27 '18 at 21:05
7

Gold reserves refers to gold in the ground that a mining company has an option to retrieve.

68 million ounces is a lot! And yes, a mining company's value is partially dependent on the size of their reserves. But it costs an exorbitant amount to retrieve gold. Newmont are projecting costs of $700-$750 per ounce in 2018, and this doesn't include their exploration costs - their all in operating costs are projected to be $965 - $1025.

  • Most obviously, the miner must get that gold out of the ground and process it. This isn't finding a gold nugget on the ground - the majority of commercial gold mining operations extract gold from ore at scale, moving lots of rock.
  • The quality of the ore is measured in g/T - grams per tonne. A few grams per tonne is a reasonable grade. A gram per tonne is a tiny amount - a millionth! One of those huge mining trucks will haul perhaps two hundred tonnes; if the grade is a reasonable 1g/t then you might get a potential 200g of gold per truck, which is about 7oz. Note that the processing will never retrieve 100% of the gold from the ore.
  • The truck has to drive from a mine site (perhaps an open pit) to a processing plant. The processing plant will be far enough away from the pit so that it doesn't need to be moved as the pit expands. The truck will have to descend/ascend via a long, low incline 'road' as it can't pull a full payload up a steep incline. Each truck will make a limited number of loads per day; it's not a 5 minute round trip.
  • The processing equipment is expensive, specialized, and requires constant tuning depending on the grade of the ore. Harder rock, softer rock, different compositions - lots of equipment depending on different scenarios; lots of specialists constantly optimizing. Under-optimize and you don't extract all the potential gold.
  • You get diminishing returns on your fixed costs as you scale up, so can't build an extraction process to handle tens of millions of ounces per year. You don't want to spend hundreds of millions building a mine for just a few years of operating life. But a longer life yields more uncertainty over future value.

The size of the reserve is useful information, but more important is the cost of extraction. The grade is far more important in driving cost - high grade ore means less rock needs to be dug up, driven around, ground and processed - or the hole doesn't need to be as deep.

You'd have to check Newmont's record of meeting their cost guidance to have confidence in it, but if their total cost is ~$1000/oz, and the current price is ~$1300 (and of course they will have to lock in contract prices at various points to avoid being completely at the mercy of the market) they are at best getting $300/oz. Returns that stretch a long way into the future are really hard to value. Often gold reserves are in countries with less stable political systems which can increase cost of operation.

Newmont has a $20bn market cap right now. If you take their 68 million ounces @ $300 profit per ounce, they only have a potential future lifetime profit of $20bn!

Kirk Broadhurst
  • 357
  • 1
  • 8
  • 1
    Should probably also keep in mind that the estimates are based off prospecting and land mass exploitable. It's entirely possible the estimates could be way off, or "lightly inflated". Generally when a company cries out how much it has in reserves, it probably means they are looking for a buyer. – Drunken Code Monkey Feb 28 '18 at 05:25