I keep hearing that you should only spend up to 20% - 30% of your credit card limit. Furthermore, owning multiple credit cards is not bad as long as you can keep it under the aggregated 20%. But, it is also said that no credit card rating is also terrible and that not using your credit card will lower your score.
Asked
Active
Viewed 204 times
-1
-
1IMO this question is too vague. Do you have any CCs now? Are you overspending your limit based on the 20-30% guideline? What are you trying to accomplish? No one on here has the credit reporting crystal ball to accurately determine how your score will be impacted by XYZ behavior change. Additionally, no credit means literally no credit, not cards with a zero balance. – quid Apr 17 '17 at 21:43
-
Regard this as a "across-the-board" question for all users of Credit Cards. – Liam Apr 17 '17 at 21:50
-
1Then I definitely think this question is way too broad and answers will be opinion based. – quid Apr 17 '17 at 21:51
-
The guidelines of usage are simple: 0% is too low, 20% is too high. The question is asking for the most minimal of usage that is beneficial to a score (i.e - 1%, 2%) that has no drawbacks. This question is not too broad, nor does it need any additional information, but solely an answer (or a response with a high degree of experience and sources). – Liam Apr 17 '17 at 21:55
-
20% utilization is too high based on what? Some opinion of some person you read on the internet, it certainly wasn't published by Experian, Transunion or Equifax. What does "too high" even mean? So (hypothetically) if your credit score was 750 at 20% utilization but it's 760 at 15% utilization what difference does that make? Additionally I have 4 sock drawer cards with zero balance right now. – quid Apr 17 '17 at 22:06
-
Related: Achieving ideal credit card utilization above 0% – Ben Miller Apr 17 '17 at 22:37
-
2Observation: Our utilization rarely exceeds 2%, our scores are over 800. No installment loans. – Loren Pechtel Apr 18 '17 at 02:29
-
@Liam Sources are great, but they are not a substitute for an answer. They should support an answer. And this doesn't actually provide a source. It says that they are out there...somewhere. Links should be either quoted (if only an excerpt is relevant) or summarized in the answer if they are part of it. You could probably get a better Meta answer on, well, Meta. – Brythan Apr 18 '17 at 21:55
1 Answers
1
Couple of things to consider.
- Building credit with a FICO score is based upon your debt utilization, Payment history, and income/debt ratios. Research FICO scores and it will tell you how they are calculated.
- If you have zero credit, don't pay interest to build credit. Make planned expenses when you have the money in the bank to cover purchases. Research other items that also build credit like transaction histories such as with utility companies or wireless phone providers.
user55662
- 11
- 1
-
1This doesn't address the question. Answers to the question, should say things like "Zero! You can use planned expenses to build credit without using any credit line whatsoever." (Not saying that's true, but it seems consistent with the claims in this post.) And answers that say to go read something else for the real answer are frowned upon here. – Brythan Apr 17 '17 at 22:41
-
@Brythan to your last line (meta question), is that for any source material (such as the links I've posted) or just "Research other items.. with no links"? I thought sources were highly encouraged on this site. – Liam Apr 18 '17 at 13:22