57

My husband and I currently own our home and are looking at upgrading to a bigger house in the next year or two. The housing market right now in our area (US East Coast city) is doing really well, and our home is valued much higher than it was when we purchased it. However, with all of the new expensive developments popping up, I strongly suspect that the housing bubble here is going to burst soon.

On the one hand, if we wait until after the market turns, then buying our new place will be much cheaper than if we moved earlier. On the other hand, waiting would also mean losing value in our current home we would be selling. One of the other reasons we're thinking about this now is that we are on year 5 of our 7-year ARM, so our interest rates will be going up if we don't sell or refinance.

Considering that we would be looking to both sell and buy property around the same time, is it better to do it when the market is up or after it makes a downturn?

I have seen both this question and this question, but they are both specifically about going from renting to owning, while we already own.

Mark Rogers
  • 109
  • 4
David K
  • 766
  • 1
  • 7
  • 13
  • 61
    Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)? – yoozer8 Oct 30 '18 at 13:19
  • @yoozer8 No, we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own. We can certainly afford to buy in the current market, so the current prices wouldn't prevent us from moving. – David K Oct 30 '18 at 13:29
  • 2
    What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer. – chepner Oct 30 '18 at 13:29
  • 7
    @DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it. – Anoplexian Oct 30 '18 at 16:32
  • 1
    @Anoplexian (and others) Right, I understand. There are a lot of non-financial factors for why I don't think we'll be going back to renting long-term, primarily the sense of stability and control that comes with owning your home. I think the suggestion to rent for a couple years is certainly a good answer, and will be useful advice for a lot of people out there, even if it's not an option I think we're likely to take. – David K Oct 30 '18 at 17:03
  • 1
    @DavidK Definitely wouldn't be a cakewalk, and I can 100% agree. I think it's just more of a sacrifice a bit of that stability and control for a better outcome later.....kind of like investing in a home....waiiiiiiitt – Anoplexian Oct 30 '18 at 17:04
  • Do you outright own the home? Or do you still have a mortgage (in which case the bank owns the house ...you'd still be renting, in a way)? – BruceWayne Oct 30 '18 at 17:23
  • Is your mortgage no-contest? How much do you expect the bubble to burst? In a state where you can "walk away" from a mortgage with no liability beyond handing the bank the house (which I believe some US states have) you have options you don't have in other areas. – Yakk Oct 30 '18 at 17:35
  • 2
    @BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now. – David K Oct 30 '18 at 18:07
  • @Yakk I'm not familiar with that term - what is a no-contest mortgage? I don't think it's going to be a major bust like in the housing crisis, but maybe more of a correction. I wouldn't say I'm super knowledgeable on the market, but things have been going up for long enough that I just think we're due for a swing in the opposite direction. – David K Oct 30 '18 at 18:11
  • @DavidK Sorry, it is called "No recourse" mortgage states. I believe the list is: "Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Minnesota, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington" – Yakk Oct 30 '18 at 18:17
  • @Yakk Ah, okay. I am in the District of Columbia, so it appears we are not. – David K Oct 30 '18 at 18:26
  • 1
    @DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market. – D Stanley Oct 30 '18 at 18:29
  • @DStanley Well, if you are in no recourse, one move to do is to maximize your mortgage, wait for a price collapse, walk away from the house, buy new house with cash from your old mortgage. This requires you to nearly own your house outright and time the market, so not advised, but only possible in no-recourse situations. – Yakk Oct 30 '18 at 18:32
  • 12
    Do you know when it will burst? – PlasmaHH Oct 30 '18 at 19:13
  • 1
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. – GS - Apologise to Monica Oct 30 '18 at 22:09
  • Have you considered buying a new place and renting out your old? – UnhandledExcepSean Oct 31 '18 at 15:27
  • @UnhandledExcepSean Yes, that is something we've seriously considered, but for now I think we would likely sell rather than keep it and rent. It's because we would want the money for a down-payment, and partly because managing a rental property just takes a lot of work! – David K Oct 31 '18 at 15:48
  • @PlasmaHH No idea when, or even if, the bubble will burst. I'm certainly no expert on this sort of thing, and a lot of this is just my gut instinct. – David K Oct 31 '18 at 15:50
  • What sense does it make then to ask this of you don't know when or if at all it happens? Doesn't sound like something to base actions on. Fwiw it might be "before" forever – PlasmaHH Oct 31 '18 at 18:46
  • 1
    @PlasmaHH Because no one can know when or if it will actually happen. It's like trying to predict the stock market, or the weather. I have a pretty strong suspicion it will happen, and my personal guess is in the next few years, but I won't really know until it actually starts to happen. – David K Oct 31 '18 at 19:29
  • 2
    The actual answer to the question at hand here, is given by DS below: "If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes.". – Fattie Nov 01 '18 at 04:11

10 Answers10

107

If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.

If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.

If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.

All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.

It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.

This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-year fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.

D Stanley
  • 133,791
  • 19
  • 313
  • 372
29

If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.

If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.

yoozer8
  • 9,514
  • 5
  • 33
  • 51
Aganju
  • 37,683
  • 7
  • 57
  • 119
  • 10
    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains – yoozer8 Oct 30 '18 at 15:16
  • 3
    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes. – yitzih Oct 30 '18 at 15:30
  • 2
    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost. – Acccumulation Oct 30 '18 at 15:45
  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost). – xyious Oct 30 '18 at 18:21
  • @Acccumulation if you sell you house and rent for a year, then buy, then all money you pay for rent is gone. If you stay in your house for that year, then you either (1) own it with no mortgage, in which case rent is clearly a large extra cost, or (2) pay a mortgage, in which case a portion of what you pay is returned to you when you sell (how large a portion depends on principal/interest breakdown) – yoozer8 Oct 31 '18 at 12:04
  • 3
    @yoozer8 Banks don't give you money for free. You have to pay interest, interest that is comparable to rent. And if you don't have a mortgage, you have opportunity cost from the money that's sitting tied up in equity that isn't earning interest. – Acccumulation Oct 31 '18 at 14:25
  • 3
    In addition, if you find moving to be a hassle (as a lot of people do) you may be better off just moving once not twice. – Ivana Nov 01 '18 at 11:15
22

Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.

The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.

Nuclear Hoagie
  • 4,595
  • 1
  • 19
  • 21
  • 20
    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage). – CactusCake Oct 30 '18 at 14:13
  • 2
    I think your second paragraph is important. The housing market in my country had a bad crash which meant prices were still falling even after the initial precipitous decrease. Everyone was trying to time the market and buy at the bottom meaning it was hard to sell when the buyers were looking at it thinking it was going to cost 1000's less next month. The reverse was true when I bought my house, by the time all the paperwork was done I was told the sellers were having second thoughts because if they put the house back on the market they could get more. – Eric Nolan Oct 31 '18 at 10:42
7

If you think you can actually pull this off, the best move is to detect bubble, sell, rent, wait for crash, buy. But you probably can't.

Let's put it this way. I detected the 2008 bubble in 2004. For this scheme to work you would have to have been able to say beforehand when the bubble would burst and sell close to the burst. My detection in 2004 was too soon and would have eaten almost all the profit if I had sold on it.

However with no equity, don't even bother trying. Interest rates and housing costs are inversely coupled. You can't play this game w/o a lot of equity because the interest rate swings will eat it up.

Joshua
  • 722
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11
  • "Interest rates and housing costs are inversely coupled."

    Unintuitively, this is not true, either long term or short term. (first result from google as a citation: https://www.bankrate.com/finance/mortgages/rising-rates-lower-house-prices.aspx the fed also has some graphs and articles explaining this that I can't find right now.)

    – Philip Nov 01 '18 at 05:13
3

I'm no financial expert, but one other thing I'd think deserves a bit of consideration is which end of the process that will be tough.

When the market is high, you'd expect ease at selling and challenge at buying.

When the market is low, you'd expect ease at buying, but challenge at selling.

So the period in the bubble would seem more rough if you need to sell before buying, because options to then buy may be very limited or even non-existent for a period. You'd have to be very focused at timing things just right, not to make any profit, but to just have a place to live at a reasonable price/convenience.

Whereas in a downturn, at least you could focus on selling your house, however long it takes, and then have many more options available to choose from when moving on. And if there turns out to be any delay between your selling and your subsequent buy, it may be a financial detriment in an inflating period, versus generally being positive in a downturn.

So stress-wise, unless you can handle it financially, I'd think waiting until it cools off may be easier... and give you more options. But who knows if or when it will occur!

Interest rate wise... you also might expect interest rates to drop some eventually if the economy significantly sours... but rates even now are still quite low, so perhaps the potential benefit to you from a housing recession may be outweighed by the dangerous potential of greater damage if significant rises continued.

In the end, I personally think it's really goes back more to the house/location you want to be in rather than trying to sneak some extra money out of the transaction. In the long-run the winners and losers tend to balance out, and if everyone could predict the right time, there'd be nothing gained from it.

3

One way or another, you are going to experience the difficulty of the market.

When a market is up, there are usually more buyers than sellers. That's what's driving the price up. This shows in how quickly a fairly priced property will sell. As a seller, this is fun. You often get the price you ask for, sometimes even more, and you sell quickly. But if you need to turn around and buy a place in this same market, you get to experience the crappy part. You are competing with all the other buyers, so you get the stress of having to check listing sites multiple times per day because places are moving that fast. And when you find a place you like, you call and get the disheartening news that they already have 8 offers, it's been bid up, so if you're not paying cash you can piss off.

This is all basically reversed if you sell/buy when the market is down. You'll really hate the selling part, probably not get the price you want, have few offers, and it'll take longer than you hoped. As a buyer, you'll have tons of time and options. It'll be downright fun.

The only way to have your cake and eat it to is to sell when the market is up, rent or move in with mom and dad, then buy when the market is down. But renting or moving in with the parents for 6 to 18 months is not really my idea of good cake.

Inasmuch as the actual numbers if you buy/sell at the same time, if the prices are fair, you are essentially just moving equity to a different property. You'll find that it's pretty close to even when all is said and done.

3

Prices are not the only issue. After a bubble bursts, it can be very difficult to sell at any realistic price, and so you can be stuck where you are while watching lots of affordable properties that you would like to buy come and go on the market. But also remember that bubbles can only be detected in retrospect. Asset price rises that seem irrational are often followed by a correction, but not invariably.

Mike Scott
  • 23,450
  • 2
  • 65
  • 77
2

For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.

The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.

You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.

Rupert Morrish
  • 7,566
  • 4
  • 26
  • 41
1

Do some research on the previous bubbles and see which areas recovered faster

Some of the things that prevent a market from dropping too much is the school district. More recently is the walkability and general feel of the neighborhood.

As the population gets older, more people want to downsize, and if your current home is in a desirable area for folks whom want to downsize it might be better hang around for while.

You also need to consider the reasons for upgrading, if you need more space for growing family, then you don't want to wait around for bubble to burst.Like a rising tide raises all boats, conversely a ebbing tide will lower all the boats.

Like the other commenters said, get out of the ARM and get a fixed mortgage while you still can. The rates can shoot up very quickly without much warning.

Renting on a temporary basis is viable option, but if you have more stuff, that can fit into the apartment, you need to include the storage space. Don't forget to include cost of move from house to apt and to house. Look at the time span on how long you will be renting, consider that while you are renting the bubble might not burst, or if it does, the real estate in the area that you are looking at does not drop that much.

user78478
  • 11
  • 1
1

The trick is start renting before the bubble bursts, then move into a house afterwards. Both of my parents did that and it worked out quite well for them!