8

In an introductory trignometry course, there are many options for introducing trigonometric functions:

  1. As ratios of sides of right triangles
  2. As coordinates (or ratios of coordinates) of intersections of the unit circle with rays from the origin
  3. As graphs that are periodic (and wavelike in the sin/cos case)

I was taught #1 first in high school, and then graphs. I saw #2 in college.

I feel that #1 is the traditional secondary-education method of introducing trigonometric functions, which has the benefit of coming a year or two after Euclidean geometry in the United States.

I feel that #2 is traditional in more rigorous textbooks used in University level courses, where radians are used.

Method #3 has the advantage that many students benefit from graphing calculators and visualize a function based on its graph.

Which of these three methods (or another unmentioned method like power series) would be best to introduce a college freshman with no math past algebra to trigonemetric functions with the goal of eventually covering the other two methods?

Brian Rushton
  • 11,680
  • 14
  • 67
  • 137
  • 2
    Related but different http://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/1330/the-best-way-to-introduce-trigonometric-functions-in-a-rigorous-analysis-course – quid Apr 27 '14 at 18:44
  • 1
    Why choose one? Demonstrate them all. Also, you forgot 4. As the real and imaginary parts of complex numbers $e^{i \theta}$. – Andrew May 04 '16 at 02:57
  • first but 2. is necessary before getting into sum angle formula.
  • –  May 04 '16 at 06:19