2

I am struggling with that book which I find to be more of second-guessing type than a book for self-study: it has cryptically written sections, no examples (and those given, and rarely, are even more cryptic than the text they are supposed to illustrate), with chapter VIII being a good example of abysmal indigestion...

Good introductions are found in the online series: Socratica's and Macauley's. The Harvard online series uses another book...

My question: Do you know of any online series on abstract algebra that uses MacLane's Algebra?

Xander Henderson
  • 7,801
  • 1
  • 20
  • 57
  • 2
    I know books Birkhoff & MacLane (1941) and MacLane & Birkhoff (1967). Is there another Algebra just by MacLane? – Gerald Edgar Jun 04 '19 at 12:13
  • For searches, it seem important to include a space: "Mac Lane". – Gerald Edgar Jun 04 '19 at 12:31
  • @GeraldEdgar Neither MathSciNet nor the University of Michigan Library knows of another "Algebra" book by Mac Lane without Birkhoff. On the other hand, the OP's description, "cryptically written" etc., certainly doesn't fit my memory of Birkhoff & Mac Lane, one of the first books from which I learned (what was then called) modern algebra – Andreas Blass Jun 04 '19 at 17:30
  • Welcome, André. Have you any undergraduate experience in modern algebra, aka, abstract algebra? If not, it may be that Mac Lane and Birkhoff is not the most suitable reference text for you. Perhaps another, different text in (modern/abstract) algebra would serve as a great precursor to accompany the text you seem to need to know.; – amWhy Jun 04 '19 at 19:38
  • 1
    For self-study of undergraduate/beginning graduate it seems Dummit and Foote's 3rd edition is a healthy goal. If you actually finish it then you've done well. Of course there are dozens of other great books; Nicholson, Beachy and Blair, Gallian for starters, I like Hungerford's undergrad. book also. Get old editions and read everything. – James S. Cook Jun 05 '19 at 02:23

0 Answers0