2

For easier reference, here is Ohio law on the subject:

https://law.justia.com/codes/ohio/2011/title29/chapter2923/section2923-24/

It would appear to violate B2, but I am curious how a locksmith would operate legally under the same conditions.

David
  • 121
  • 1

1 Answers1

5

Note that an essential element of the offense here is "with purpose to use it criminally."

The specifications in B allow a presumption of such purpose, but such a presumption is rebuttable.

The tools of a locksmith are somewhat different from those of a criminal "cracksman", I understand, and would probably not be considered "designed or specially adapted for criminal use". But even if they were, proof of regular employment as a locksmith would tend to rebut the presumption of criminal intent.

Possession of tools with the intent of lawfully opening one's own lock would not be criminal intent, but a judge or jury might not be convinced of that.

Ryan M
  • 10,274
  • 2
  • 45
  • 63
David Siegel
  • 113,558
  • 10
  • 204
  • 404