7

I'm currently learning Russian and I want to experiment a bit. Having recently learnt Esperanto, it is a bit exasperating to go back to a language with grammatical genders. I'd love a course that teaches a form other than the "masculine" form first. I'm curious if there is any course for any language - Spanish, French, any obscure language with lots of grammatical genders - that takes this approach.

An example: In a podcast I'm listening to right now, I was taught the word for student using these words:

студент - a student

студентка - a (female) student

I'd like a course that does it this way around:

студентка - a (female) student

студент - a student

So, is there a course for any language that teaches the feminine form first?

Charlotte SL
  • 960
  • 8
  • 12
  • 2
    Welcome back on LLSE and thanks for the original question. – Tsundoku Dec 02 '16 at 21:16
  • Is there a particular reason you'd prefer to learn the feminine form first? Also, for what language specifically do you want resources for? Russian? – fi12 Dec 02 '16 at 22:19
  • As far as I know, the -ка suffix can be used with a great number of nouns. So it can be argued that no matter if it's the masculine or the feminine form that you encounter, you learn both at the same time, as the differences are quite regular. – michau Dec 03 '16 at 07:47
  • 1
    @fi12 Actually, I'd just like a course that takes a different approach. Every course starts with the masculine and then the feminine. Why not do it the other way around? I'd love for it to be specifically about Russian, since that is what I'm learning right now, but I realize how unusual my request is, so that's why I'd love to know if anyone anywhere has done it. – Charlotte SL Dec 03 '16 at 23:50
  • 1
    @michau, no that's not true. You don't learn them at the same time - just in the same space of time. You learn them right after one another. I'd like a course that says "студентка" and then teaches "студент". The male form usually comes first, and in many cases because it is the "default" form. The feminine is the "aberration". – Charlotte SL Dec 03 '16 at 23:54
  • @fi12 I understand a lot of good reasons why the masculine form is taught first - it has always been done that way, plurals are often based on it, consistency is important etc. I'm just wondering if it should be done this way and if it can be done in a different way. I can't be the first person to wonder about this, can I? – Charlotte SL Dec 04 '16 at 00:03
  • 3
    I think this is a good question and a fair criticism of most language courses which don't even consider this or ever mix up the order. For Russian, I agree with others who say that this is probably pedagogically unwise for nouns and past tense verbs, because in those instances the feminine forms are clearly derived from the masculine forms from suffixation. However, this is not true for the adjectives nor for the pronouns which decline like adjectives, and the feminine versions of those decline more in the inanimate accusative than the masculine or neutral forms which don't change. Moreover, – Chill2Macht Dec 04 '16 at 17:12
  • 1
    the change in the feminine forms of adjectives for accusative mirrors the declension pattern of feminine nouns in the accusative and thus is arguably easier to learn. (ie masculine nouns don't generally don't end with ы or й or ый in the accusative, but feminine nouns do generally end in у). Also in the remaining cases the declension of feminine adjectives is much easier, hence it can be beneficial to learn first. So I think there is a good argument for beginning with the feminine form for adjectives in Russian. Of course, all of this assumes that it is easier to learn to add a suffix than to – Chill2Macht Dec 04 '16 at 17:17
  • 1
    remove a suffix -- honestly I am not sure there is any reason why that should or shouldn't be true. And if there isn't any reason why removing suffixes is harder to learn than adding suffixes, the arguments against beginning with the feminine forms of derived nouns and past tense verbs go up in smoke. (Note: when I say nouns I only mean derived ones, like медведица , not generic/general ones like лампа which are not derived from any masculine form) – Chill2Macht Dec 04 '16 at 17:19
  • 1
    Also for courses for languages like German for which the feminine forms aren't even derived from the masculine ones for almost any type of grammatical object (except for Student/Studentin, but that's an anomaly) there really is no excuse. I guess one could say that numerically there are more masculine German nouns than feminine ones, but it's something only like 40% to 30% plus doesn't account for the frequency of use of the nouns (e.g. most of the most important noun-generating suffixes are feminine). But even for German I'm not aware of any such courses, although there should be. – Chill2Macht Dec 04 '16 at 17:35
  • In the book I'm using, the word la maîtresse was introduced before le maître. For other pairs, the masculine-feminine were presented in the opposite order, or together simulatneously. If listing words simultaneously, as in a list or in a dictionary, it seems to be standard style to list the masculine form first. Such a style rule doesn't mean that the writer is giving some kind of preference to masculine professions or nouns. – Brandin Aug 30 '21 at 09:24

2 Answers2

6

One language where starting with feminine nouns first is common is Latin. Latin nouns are composed of several declensions, the first of which specializes in feminine nouns. Many Latin courses and textbooks cover this first declension first, before introducing other declensions that contain most masculine and neuter nouns. Here's an online course/text from the National Archives of the UK that introduces the first declension first.

One might make an argument that technically there are First Declension nouns that are not feminine, but the declension clearly can be considered a feminine form that is subject to a few exceptions (and every natural language has a few).

Robert Columbia
  • 1,244
  • 3
  • 9
  • 24
  • 2
    I can still remember learning my first declensions of Latin under the feminine form as if it were yesterday and we used the Cambridge method at that time. – Ken Graham Dec 07 '16 at 01:52
  • I studied it with Wheelock's Latin and we also did the first declension first. I think the first word we learned may have been puella (girl). – Robert Columbia Dec 07 '16 at 16:36
  • 1
    "In pictura est puella nomine Cornelia." –  Dec 09 '16 at 19:05
5

I'm not sure if I understand what your experiment consists of. Do you want to check if it's possible to learn a language by learning female forms first? You don't need a special course to do that, simply ignore the male forms as they appear and only pay attention to the female forms. Or do you want to know if it's possible to construct such a course? There is no reason for it not to be possible, but at least for Russian, it would require a lot of attention to how you construct the dialogues, so I don't think that such a course exists.

Russian verbs have different first person form in the past tense, depending on your sex. For example, when you want to say “I wrote”, as a woman you say “Я написала” and as a man you say “Я написал”. Similarly for adjectives: “I'm happy” for a woman is “Я счастли́вая” and for a man is “Я счастли́вый”. So such a course would have to make sure that no male in the dialogues introduces new gender-specific forms, new adjectives are introduced in example sentences about feminine nouns, etc.

For the same reason I don't think any Russian course manages to consistently introduce male forms first, unless it's very short. To check that, I googled "Russian course" and looked at the first result. In the past tense lesson you have "пошла", "спросила", "ела", "жила", "позвонила", "окончила", "начала", "посетила", all introduced for the first time in their feminine form, and not the masculine.

So I doubt that anybody cares enough to make sure that all dialogues and examples always introduce the form for one of the sexes first and the other sex later. I think the most likely person to care would be Suzette Haden Elgin, the constructor of the feminist conlang Láadan. But the Láadan course defines the third-person pronoun as “he, she, it”, so it looks like she doesn't care either.

michau
  • 2,314
  • 14
  • 14
  • I think I understood your point about the past tense verbs, but not the adjectives. I don't think the OP is asking whether there is a course that considers the feminine forms of all aspects of the language before introducing any masculine forms of any aspect of the language, I had the impression at least that they are asking for a course which, at least sometimes, when a new topic is introduced begins with the feminine form and then goes to the masculine, e.g. написала написал средняя средий, not the following: написала средняя написал средний. If that makes any sense. – Chill2Macht Dec 04 '16 at 17:29
  • @William If we are to understand that the OP is asking about a Russian course that sometimes introduces the feminine form first, I believe that basically every course would fit the bill. To check that, I just googled "Russian course" and looked at the first result. In the past tense lesson you have "пошла", "спросила", "ела", "жила", "позвонила", "окончила", "начала", "посетила", all introduced for the first time in their feminine form, and not the masculine. – michau Dec 04 '16 at 18:18
  • I didn't ask what course creator's feelings around the order was. As such I don't understand what you mean with "If the order male and female forms is not big deal for Suzette Haden Elgin, I don't think it's a problem for creators of other language courses.". There is no "problem". It's just a question if such a course exists. I also don't really understand your answer. You mean that Russian courses don't consistently introduce male forms first? Maybe you can expand your answer to clarify this. – Charlotte SL Dec 04 '16 at 19:53
  • @CharlotteSL I'm not sure if I understand what you're exactly trying to do, but I hope my updated answer is clearer. – michau Dec 04 '16 at 21:00
  • @michau Thank you. No one would actually have to change the dialogue, since it is only about the order. I clarified the question, too, to show this. Thank you so much for your effort! – Charlotte SL Dec 04 '16 at 23:23
  • 2
    @CharlotteSL By the way, that's not really a language course, but in any case, feminine declensions in this Polish declension dictionary come first, followed by masculine and neuter. – michau Dec 05 '16 at 07:02