According to this lecture, Newton did measure $n_{air}$ compared with vacuum, tho' they give no details. Perhaps the original source, "Newton, Opticks, The Fourth edition, Ed. W. Innys, London, 1730," provides more details. It's available at Gutenberg.org .
Peeking at Newton's book, I find
The Refraction of the Air in this Table is determin'd by that of the
Atmosphere observed by Astronomers. For, if Light pass through many
refracting Substances or Mediums gradually denser and denser, and
terminated with parallel Surfaces, the Sum of all the Refractions will
be equal to the single Refraction which it would have suffer'd in
passing immediately out of the first Medium into the last. And this
holds true, though the Number of the refracting Substances be
increased to Infinity, and the Distances from one another as much
decreased, so that the Light may be refracted in every Point of its
Passage, and by continual Refractions bent into a Curve-Line. And
therefore the whole Refraction of Light in passing through the
Atmosphere from the highest and rarest Part thereof down to the lowest
and densest Part, must be equal to the Refraction which it would
suffer in passing at like Obliquity out of a Vacuum immediately into
Air of equal Density with that in the lowest Part of the Atmosphere.
There may be more details elsewhere but I haven't read the entire chapter.
There are plenty of papers dating back at least to the 1950s which provide empirical formulas for calculating the index based on gas ratios and relative humidity of the sample. But to your first question: any published value for $n$ is published with the calculated uncertainty; if that's missing then the default is to assume $\pm 1$ in the last digit, or half that. Since you quoted a number without reference to a specific sample, I suspect that's as precise as one can get for "average atmosphere at sea level and $25^{\circ} C $ .