7

Context: I've been reading a lot about Set Theory lately, and how it suddenly sprung onto the mathematical scene in the late 1800's, thanks largely to Cantor. But it seems strange to me that no one had ever done anything similar to it before, so I was wondering...

Are there any historical instances of someone inventing something similar to Set Theory? Or is it actually the case that no one had considered anything like it until the 1800's?

2 Answers2

4

There were no historical instances. This is exactly why this discovery is considered so great. It is a feature of truly great discoveries that after they are made, people ask: why did nobody think like this before ?

Set theory is the best example of this I can think of.

Comparable perhaps only to Kepler's First law and General Relativity. I do not know any other examples of such radical changes in our thinking, made by one person.

Perhaps other members will give other examples.

Alexandre Eremenko
  • 48,930
  • 3
  • 80
  • 177
  • "Why did nobody think like this before?" Isn't the answer in the case of general relativity pretty clear? Before special relativity 1905 there wasn't the necessity, and before Minkowski there wasn't the idea to use the geometric math. Following these events, the first theory seems to be Nordströms. – Nikolaj-K Dec 25 '14 at 01:36
  • @Nikolaj-K: well, perhaps general relativity is not such a clean example, though it seems that a) Nordstrom's theory was not quite correct (not consistent with observations), and b) Einstein developed his version independently (as far as I know). – Alexandre Eremenko Mar 20 '24 at 13:31
  • 1
    Just so you know, I expect you to reply to this comment in 2034. – Nikolaj-K Mar 20 '24 at 18:55
  • @Nikolaj-K: As you see, I replied 10 years before your deadline. – Alexandre Eremenko Mar 21 '24 at 10:13
3

Set theory and the term set (German: Menge) has been invented by Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848). In his posthumous book Paradoxien des Unendlichen, Reclam, Leipzig (1851), but also in his Wissenschaftslehre, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Stuttgart (1985), Bolzano-Gesamtausgabe, Series I Vol. 11,1, he considers sets and the properties of their elements. It is just another set theory than that invented by Cantor but certainly not worse. Bolzano does not accept the one-to-one correspondence as a tool to measure sets. But he accepts different infinities: There are infinitely many tetrahedrons but there are four times as many corners of tetrahedrons.

The main idea of set theory however, grouping certain objects with common properties, is much older than the term set / Menge. Euclid for instance considered "every given number of prime numbers".

  • I strongly disagree with your evaluation "not worse". This kind of "set theory" had no following. Every modern mathematician will agree that the set of tetrahedron is of the same cardinality as the set of vertices of tetrahedra. – Alexandre Eremenko Mar 20 '24 at 13:26