11

I am a bit puzzled by the outcome in this book. It looks like Satan was right - Job DID lose his faithfulness toward God after Satan took away from Job all what God had given him except for his life (he "cursed" the day he was born (Job 3:3-4)). And in the end God had to appear to Job in order to restore his faith. Does that mean that the Satan was able to prove to God that Job was not as faithful as God thought in the beginning of the book?

brilliant
  • 4,978
  • 13
  • 48
  • 76
  • 2
    the way I read it, God does not appear in order to restore Job's faith; he appears to affirm his majesty. Indeed, God affirms that it is Job, not Job's friends, who have spoken rightly. – Dan Fefferman Apr 27 '23 at 16:05
  • @SonofaBeach - Done. – brilliant Apr 28 '23 at 04:42
  • @SonofaBeach - I could do that if that was my belief, but since it is not, the one who has that belief needs to be asked. – brilliant Apr 28 '23 at 04:47
  • 1
    Sorry, I'm misunderstanding something. I'm trying to figure out why you stated that "Job DID lose his faithfulness toward God". I can't see how you come to that conclusion, or why you posted that. I thought that you added (via a post edit) the "he cursed the day he was born" to support your original statement. But I can't see that it does support your original statement. So I'm just trying to figure out what is your reasoning for your "Job DID lose his faithfulness" statement. If that is not your belief, then can you please explain further why you posted it. – Son of a Beach Apr 28 '23 at 04:50
  • @SonofaBeach - What I mean is that Job didn't lose his faith in God, but lost his faithfulness. He became less faithful in his following God, that is, the quality of his faith has changed, not the faith itself. You can also say that his faith has changed, but not disappeared. Before, he was willfully and thankfully accepting from God whatever was coming his way from God, but later he cursed the day his was born. That's definitely not an act of thankfully accepting what God has done for you. – brilliant Apr 28 '23 at 05:13
  • 1
    Thanks for your explanation. I disagree with the logic, but thanks for following up. It might be worth editing your question to make it clearer. – Son of a Beach Apr 29 '23 at 07:11
  • @SonofaBeach - What logic exactly do you disagree with? – brilliant Apr 29 '23 at 09:25
  • 1
    Just that “he cursed the day he was born” means he lost his faithfulness. I don’t see it that way. But it’s just my opinion. – Son of a Beach Apr 30 '23 at 11:12
  • @SonofaBeach - It depends on how you define faithfulness. – brilliant Apr 30 '23 at 14:05
  • Agreed... that's just what I was thinking... it's difficult to answer the question without first describing the logic used to derive that statement, and secondly defining the relevant terms (eg, "faithfulness") for the context of the question. :-) – Son of a Beach May 01 '23 at 00:20
  • You need to quote the passage and context where God appears to support your interpretation – Michael16 May 01 '23 at 06:59
  • @Michael16 - Didn't I already cite Job 3:3-4? – brilliant May 01 '23 at 08:52
  • You should quote all the reference for your claims/interpretations. Where was Job was shown not faithful? His cursing his fate merely shows his lamentation, a natural reaction in his state. What makes you think he lost or was not faithful, u need to quote that. – Michael16 May 01 '23 at 09:40
  • @Michael16 - I think it's all clear in my question as it is. "What makes you think he lost or was not faithful?" - Exactly what he did in Job 3:3-4, that is, cursing the day he was born. – brilliant May 01 '23 at 11:54
  • This means you think losing faith in himself or hating himself means he lost faith or faithfulness to God. This is highly misguided mistake. – Michael16 May 01 '23 at 12:06
  • @Michael16 - "This means you think losing faith in himself or hating himself..." - No, that doesn't mean that. – brilliant May 01 '23 at 12:28
  • I feel this question is moving the goalposts. The wager was that Job would "curse you to your face", which Job does not do, even in Job 3:3-4. It wasn't that Job would fully maintain his faith with no changes, and especially not by the standard that even a change of the quality of his faith or lack of thankfulness would be a failure. – ojchase May 01 '23 at 15:56

8 Answers8

17

No, Job never lost his faithfulness to God. So Satan lost and God won the first argument (that a righteous person will remain faithful although the blessings were removed). But the second argument between Job and God about why God allows a righteous person to suffer, was NOT resolved.

Nevertheless, Job never lost his faith in God demonstrated below:

  1. Did he ever curse God? No. Some may say that Job "cursed" the day of his birth (Job 3:1), but this BH.SE answer explains that we should interpret it in context, that the whole Chapter 3 is a lament of his condition, appealing to God asking what God wants him to use his remaining life for (v. 23) that by then is hanging by a thread (vv. 20-22). Implicit in the lament (and elsewhere) is Job's faith in a God who is sovereign over his birth and whole life, and to whom he needs to glorify by living righteously despite no earthly rewards.

  2. Job's faith in God was also implicit throughout his speeches in that he strongly believed that the righteous God MUST have an explanation if He only deigned to explain himself in the Heavenly court. Since Job knew his own heart, the unknown was God's heart, though by faith Job believed Him to be just AND (for Job) was to be the redeemer who WOULD vindicate him and his good name in the Heavenly court (Job 19:25-26, see interpretation here), since Job seems to be losing in the Human court of his 3 friends.

  3. Even in the face of his 3 friends's entreaties that Job must have done something grievous to deserve the suffering, Job maintained his innocence by saying he had nothing new to repent and refused their simplistic explanation that suffering MUST be the result of sin, which reduces God's justice to transactional motivator to be good, common to the ancient near eastern understanding (that the righteous are blessed and the wicked are punished, the retribution principle). That's why God rebuked those 3 friends. In contrast, Job believed His God values character and relational faithfulness ABOVE simple rewards and punishment.

  4. Elihu's message was a lot better because he recognized that Job's demand was valid, acknowledged a mystery about God's allowing the suffering to happen, and rebuked the 3 friends for condemning Job. But he then advised Job to respect the great disparity between creatures and Creator and that the Creator is under no obligation to answer. That's why God didn't rebuke Elihu. BUT STILL, unlike a Stoic who just endures, Job refuses to withdraw his demand to be heard, which (in my opinion) is yet another sign of faith in a good God who wouldn't let His righteous people hanging like an abandoned child.

Thus God appearing to Job in the end was not to restore his faith, but to comfort him and to aid Job in his later life of faith. But although God refused to explain why such great misfortunes happened to Job specifically or to a righteous person in general, God DID:

  • grant him vindication of innocence
  • restore his honor (seems very important in the Ancient Near Eastern culture, as seen also in the Psalms)
  • treat him as a person

In that personal response to Job, God showed himself righteous, so God's own righteousness was vindicated while reserving His right not to disclose everything.

Today's application

God's refusing to provide full accounting is similar to our situation today where there is no perfect theodicy and that every individual Christian needs to struggle with his/her own personal unexplainable suffering, although after Jesus came we are in a much better position than Job: Jesus (in his solidarity with the sufferers and in his future judgment of our enemies) gave us comfort as well as additional 2 reasons not described in the Book of Job, namely our sanctification and the greater good of the church. Like God's appearance to Job, God's incarnation in Jesus helps us to remain faithful like Job, to not lose hope, and most importantly to STILL believe God to be perfectly good and perfectly just, worthy of our continued worship and obedience.

In his crying out to God, Job is similar to the Psalmist who sometimes asks why God DOES NOT YET ACT when he, who remains faithful by keep trying to remain in the righteous path, repenting when he realized his sins, was mocked or even persecuted by the wicked. Like Job and the Psalmist, it is okay to implore God to rescue and bless us so we have reason to praise God (the common trope is how can a dead person praise God, or Job's asking why he should have been born in the first place), while at the same time trusting His own ways and timing befitting a Creator who is much greater than us and whom we have no right to understand completely.

GratefulDisciple
  • 3,297
  • 16
  • 37
  • 1
    Actually, I like your answer. Thank you. In Job 1:11 Satan said to God about Job, "...he will curse thee to thy face." Did Job finally curse God before God appeared to him? – brilliant Apr 27 '23 at 14:54
  • Even though God didn't provide Job the requested explanation, God did, however, vindicate Job against false charges by rebuking the 3 friends who falsely condemned him out of their defective notions of God's justice. We also see how God in the end uphold the "retribution principle" after all, in the greater scheme of things. This is indeed the hope of every Christian, that every wrong will be made right in the end which includes: Day of Judgment, wiping away every tear, rewards for those who suffer for Christ, and eternal happiness. – GratefulDisciple Apr 27 '23 at 15:20
  • 1 Thank you for your defense of Job as well as your basic answer, although I have to say that in the end the retribution principle is an insufficient answer. I agree with those who see the epilogue as not being part of the original work, a Disney ending to an intentionally ambiguous story.
  • – Dan Fefferman Apr 27 '23 at 16:19
  • @DanFefferman I agree with you that God's upholding the "retribution principle" does NOT exhaust the entirety of God's character. The Book of Job indirectly testifies to this. Even in the rest of the OT it has already been made clear that God's relationship with Israel is more characterized by "unfailing love" and "faithfulness" symbolized as husband and wife, and who protects the weak, contrasted with relationship with other ANE gods which is more of a master-slave relations. – GratefulDisciple Apr 27 '23 at 18:13
  • @DanFefferman I can agree that the prologue & epilogue being added later, maybe an attempt to adapt a similar ANE theodicy story to into "suffering as a test to improve character", which even later (in light of the canon, and even later after NT canon) can ALSO be used as theodicy that includes an eschatological dimension which I alluded in my comment above. – GratefulDisciple Apr 27 '23 at 18:15