1

The union between man and woman, which we currently understand as the covenant of marriage, was part of God's original plan for His creation according to Genesis 2:

20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him. 21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. 22 And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. 23 Then the man said,

    “This at last is bone of my bones
    and flesh of my flesh;
    she shall be called Woman,
    because she was taken out of Man.”

24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

[Genesis 2:20-24, ESV]

Notice that this was established before the fall, when sin had not yet infiltrated mankind. At this point, there was still no need for a Messiah and a plan of redemption. Yet, we are later revealed that marriage has a very important symbolic meaning: it points to the heavenly marriage between Jesus Christ (the Bridegroom) and the Church (his Bride):

6 Then I heard what seemed to be the voice of a great multitude, like the roar of many waters and like the sound of mighty peals of thunder, crying out,

    “Hallelujah! For the Lord our God
    the Almighty reigns. 7 Let us rejoice and exult
    and give him the glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come,
    and his Bride has made herself ready; 8 it was granted her to clothe herself
    with fine linen, bright and pure”—

for the fine linen is the righteous deeds of the saints.

9 And the angel said to me, “Write this: Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.” And he said to me, “These are the true words of God.”

[Revelation 19:6-9, ESV]

This symbolic parallelism is in fact acknowledged as a mystery by Paul:

22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.

25 Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, 26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, 27 so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. 28 In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, 30 because we are members of his body. 31 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. 33 However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.

[Ephesians 5:22-33, ESV]

Question: Did God create marriage in Eden with a messianic symbolism already built in? Did God create Adam and Eve already knowing that they would fall and that there would be a need for a Savior, and a Church, and heavenly marriage between the two? In other words, was the fall of man always part of the plan, and was marriage created precisely to foreshadow the plan of redemption?

  • The failure of the first humanity was foreknown and did not deter the Almighty from his purpose of 'bringing many sons to glory'. But it was not part of a 'plan'. You make it sound as if God planned the event rather than foreseeing, by divine wisdom, the inherent liability of a created (intelligent) creature, and by determinate and unanimous counsels within Deity, proceeding with creation despite the inevitability, with redemption and glorification already in view. – Nigel J May 08 '21 at 08:13
  • 1
    God knew all things in all time. However, do not make the metaphor the master of the type - the metaphor is the servant of the type; so the question is misguided. – Dottard May 08 '21 at 09:01
  • Please read patiently and forgive my response if it offends you. I believe this view that the greek text gives that G-d planned Jesus salvation shows that God is very evil. I realized that to understand G-d and his creation it is simple if I applied my and my child's relationship. (If I see my relationship with my child I can understand G-d better). 1. I wanted to have my child so I can love her, care for her and see her flourish. 2. Even before she was born, I knew how much sin was around and how much bad can happen to her. – Yeddu May 08 '21 at 10:43
  • I feared she will get exposed to bad and might sin. 4. As she grew bigger, I used to pray for her and spend more and more time with her to encourage her and keep her close to G-d. 5. I tried hard to create a framework for her of what is good and what is bad. 6. As she was growing up more, I helped her understand she is going wrong both lovingly and sternly when she crossed the line. 6. Any number of times she filed, I was there to encourage her. 7. Any number of time and any severity of her mistakes and short commings I forgave her as she is my child.
  • – Yeddu May 08 '21 at 10:43
  • 1
  • What I did not do a. buy blood from the blood bank in advance believing she cannot stay away from accidents b. Reserve a bed for her in a de-addiction centre thinking that she will become a drug addict, c. I did not search a possible groom her believing that she will be divorced d. I did not prepare for her grave even though I knew for sure she will die someday. Our G-d is like that.
  • – Yeddu May 08 '21 at 10:44
  • He knows what might happen to us unlike me about my daughter, but all he does is guides us with his laws, gives us second chances once we goof up, is always there to forgive us no matter how many times we go away from him. This teaching that Adam sinned and we need Jesus to get us back to G-d is not what Tanakh teaches. God bless. – Yeddu May 08 '21 at 10:44
  • This is an interesting grouping of passages. I believe the answer is a definite yes, though it certainly leaves a lot to unpack. Upvoted +1. BTW, congrats on snagging a gold badge! – Hold To The Rod May 09 '21 at 01:07
  • @HoldToTheRod - thanks for the compliments, though for some reason I cannot see the badge anymore. It looks like the system awarded the badge but then decided to retract it. My guess is that it was probably due to this question which currently has a net score of -1. –  May 09 '21 at 01:28
  • @HoldToTheRod - thank you very much for the upvote (I'm assuming it was you). Now the badge is back =) –  May 09 '21 at 02:25
  • I thought it was an insightful question (though I don't know the answer), and it didn't deserve a negative score. – Hold To The Rod May 09 '21 at 03:19