9

The bible doesn't seem to give much information for who "the prophetess" in Isaiah 8:3 is. Who is she? Many seem to assert that she is his wife, but cite no evidence to support this.

The word הַנְּבִיאָ֜ה (the prophetess) occurs 5 times in the bible.

  1. Exodus 15:20
  2. 2 Kings 22:14
  3. 2 Chronicles 34:22
  4. Nehemiah 6:14
  5. Isaiah 8:3

I'm not sure of the time in which Isaiah lived, but I think he was alive in 2 and 3. Could it be that he committed adultery with Shallum's wife? If so, is it in the nature of God to incorporate sin in his revelation?

Is there evidence that she is his wife?

Stephen
  • 263
  • 1
  • 2
  • 9
  • 2
    Hi Stephen and welcome to [Hermeneutics.SE]! Intriguing question and I'm curious now too. – Jon Ericson Nov 29 '12 at 19:05
  • Could the prophetess revealed here be a future prophecy? One that is to take place? Given this book "if" inspired by God and perhaps written "outside of time" ....could some of these writings still be yet to be? –  Dec 03 '12 at 09:35

7 Answers7

8

That is a good question, Stephen. Isaiah does not give many details, but he also does not claim that God told him to go in to this woman. He only claims that God provided the name for the child.

There are a few things to consider:

  1. Isaiah was told to take his son with him in the previous chapter (Isaiah 7:3), which should indicate that he did have a wife.

    Isaiah 7:3 (ESV)
    And the Lord said to Isaiah, “Go out to meet Ahaz, you and Shear-jashub your son, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool on the highway to the Washer's Field.

  2. Isaiah was not rebuked for committing adultery, while other high-level people had been. Such happenings are poor examples for all of those who look to these individuals, and God typically dealt with them. If you remember Psalm 51, David was afraid that God's spirit would be removed from him in the same way that God's spirit had been removed from the previous king.

  3. If Isaiah had committed adultery, the passage containing Isaiah 57:3 would ring hollow since it would have come from an adulterer.

    Isaiah 57:3 (ESV)
    But you, draw near, sons of the sorceress, offspring of the adulterer and the loose woman.

Caleb
  • 5,806
  • 11
  • 49
  • 88
EpicVoyage
  • 196
  • 1
  • 5
  • Hi and welcome to the site! Those are great points. And that seems the most natural reading to me. It seems a bit like people who have pseudonyms (say, "The Prophet") and refer to their wives as Mrs. pseudonym ("Mrs. Prophet" or "prophetess"). I don't know if that would be historically accurate, however. – Jon Ericson Nov 30 '12 at 18:57
  • Thanks, Jon! There is some historical merit for your point (regardless of whether "Prophetess" can be proven). The wife of the King always had a corresponding title. – EpicVoyage Nov 30 '12 at 19:23
  • It's odd to me that he's referring to her in such a distant way: "the prophetess". It doesn't imply a relationship at all. He could have said "the love of my life" or "my wife" or something like that instead. – Stephen Dec 02 '12 at 21:53
  • @Stephen though you'd have to know Hebrew idiom to know whether it would be impersonal or not. Perhaps it is a question of emphasis: by using this title Isaiah is emphasising her role rather than her relationship to himself, for narrative effect? – Jack Douglas Dec 06 '12 at 10:26
  • That makes sense to me now, because it shows credibility of both parents – Stephen Dec 20 '12 at 16:37
0

Is it remarkable to suppose that someone in the 6,000 year history of mankind had the same question? It is worth looking then for some commentators who are experts in hermeneutics, Hebrew and Greek to see if they may have already addressed this question.

For example, in his Exposition of the Bible, John Gill (1697 – 1771) notes of Isaiah 8:3 :

And I went unto the prophetess

His wife, so called; not because she prophesied, but because she was the wife of a prophet; and besides, the birth of her son later mentioned, and his name, had in them the nature of a prophecy. The phrase of going unto her is an euphemism, a modest way of expressing the conjugal debt: and she conceived and bare a son;

The Geneva Divines states:

  1. Meaning, to his wife, and this was done in a vision.
  2. Or, make speed to the spoil: haste to the prey.

Matthew Henry's commentary (1662-1714) records the following:

He must take a great roll, which would contain those five chapters fairly written in words at length; and he must write in it all that he had foretold concerning the king of Assyria’s invading the country; he must write it with a man’s pen, in the usual way and style of writing, so as that it might be legible and intelligible by all. See Hab. 2:2 , Write the vision, and make it plain. Those that speak and write of the things of God should avoid obscurity, and study to speak and write so as to be understood, 1 Co. 14:19 . Those that write for men should write with a man’s pen, and not covet the pen or tongue of angels. And forasmuch as it is usual to put some short, but significant comprehensive title before books that are published, the prophet is directed to call his book Maher-shalal-hash-baz—Make speed to the spoil, hasten to the prey, intimating that the Assyrian army should come upon them with great speed and make great spoil. By this title the substance and meaning of the book would be enquired after by those that heard of it, and remembered by those that had read it or heard it read. It is sometimes a good help to memory to put much matter in few words, which serve as handles by which we take hold of more.II. The care of the prophet to get this record well attested (v. 2): I took unto me faithful witnesses to record; he wrote the prophecy in their sight and presence, and made them subscribe their names to it, that they might be ready, if afterwards there should be occasion, to make oath of it, that the prophet had so long before foretold the descent which the Assyrians made upon that country. He names his witnesses for the greater certainty, that they might be appealed to by any. They were two in number (for out of the mouth of two witnesses shall every word be established ); one was Uriah the priest; he is mentioned in the story of Ahaz, but for none of his good deeds, for he humoured Ahaz with an idolatrous altar (2 Ki. 16:10, 2 Ki. 16:11 ); however, at this time, no exception lay against him, being a faithful witness. See what full satisfaction the prophets took care to give to all persons concerned of the sincerity of their intentions, that we might know with a full assurance the certainty of the things wherein we have been instructed, and that we have not followed cunningly-devised fables. III. The making of the title of his book the name of his child, that it might be the more taken notice of and the more effectually perpetuated, v. 3. His wife (because the wife of a prophet) is called the prophetess; she conceived and bore a son, another son, who must carry a sermon in his name, as the former had done ch. 7:3 ), but with this difference, that spoke mercy, Shear-jashub—The remnant shall return; but, that being slighted, this speaks judgment, Maher-shalal-hash-baz—In making speed to the spoil he shall hasten, or he has hastened, to the prey. The prophecy is doubled, even in this one name, for the thing was certain. I will hasten my word, Jer. 1:12 . Every time the child was called by his name, or any part of it, it would serve as a memorandum of the judgments approaching. Note, It is good for us often to put ourselves in mind of the changes and troubles we are liable to in this world, and which perhaps are at the door. When we look with pleasure on our children it should be with the allay of this thought, We know not what they are yet reserved for.IV. The prophecy itself, which explains this mystical name.1. That Syria and Israel, who were now in confederJohn Gillacy against Judah, should in a very little time become an easy prey to the king of Assyria and his victorious army.

And finally, Adam Clarke shares these thoughts in his commentary:

CHAPTER VIII

Prediction respecting the conquest of Syria and Israel by the Assyrians, 1-4. Israel, for rejecting the gentle stream of Shiloah, near Jerusalem, is threatened to be overflowed by the great river of Assyria, manifestly alluding by this strong figure to the conquests of Tiglath-pileser and Shalmaneser over that kingdom, 5-7. The invasion of the kingdom of Judah by the Assyrians under Sennacherib foretold, 8. The prophet assures the Israelites and Syrians that their hostile attempts against Judah shall be frustrated, 9, 10. Exhortation not to be afraid of the wrath of man, but to fear the displeasure of God, 11-13. Judgments which shall overtake those who put no confidence in Jehovah, 14, 15.

The prophet proceeds to warn his countrymen against idolatry, divination, and the like sinful practices, exhorting them to seek direction from the word of God, professing in a beautiful apostrophe that this was his own pious resolution. And to enforce this counsel, and strengthen their faith, he points to his children, whose symbolic names were signs or pledges of the Divine promises, 16-20. Judgments of God against the finally impenitent, 21, 22.

The prophecy of the foregoing chapter relates directly to the kingdom of Judah only: the first part of it promises them deliverance from the united invasion of the Israelites and Syrians; the latter part, from Isa 8:17, denounces the desolation to be brought upon the kingdom of Judah by the Assyrians. The sixth, seventh, and eighth verses of this chapter seem to take in both the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. "This people that refuseth the waters of Shiloah," may be meant of both: the Israelites despised the kingdom of Judah, which they had deserted, and now attempted to destroy; the people of Judah, from a consideration of their own weakness, and a distrust of God's promises, being reduced to despair, applied to the Assyrians for assistance against the two confederate kings. But how could it be said of Judah, that they rejoiced in Rezin, and the son of Remaliah, the enemies confederated against them? If some of the people were inclined to revolt to the enemy, (which however does not clearly appear from any part of the history or the prophecy,) yet there was nothing like a tendency to a general defection. This, therefore, must be understood of Israel. The prophet denounces the Assyrian invasion, which should overwhelm the whole kingdom of Israel under Tiglath-pileser, and Shalmaneser; and the subsequent invasion of Judah by the same power under Sennacherib, which would bring them into the most imminent danger, like a flood reaching to the neck, in which a man can but just keep his head above water. The two next verses, 9 and 10, Isa 8:9, 10, are addressed by the prophet, as a subject of the kingdom of Judah, to the Israelites and Syrians, and perhaps to all the enemies of God's people; assuring them that their attempts against that kingdom shall be fruitless; for that the promised Immanuel, to whom he alludes by using his name to express the signification of it, for God is with us, shall be the defence of the house of David, and deliver the kingdom of Judah out of their hands. He then proceeds to warn the people of Judah against idolatry, divination, and the like forbidden practices; to which they were much inclined, and which would soon bring down God's judgments upon Israel. The prophecy concludes at the sixth verse of Isa 9:6 with promises of blessings in future times by the coming of the great deliverer already pointed out by the name of Immanuel, whose person and character is set forth in terms the most ample and magnificent.

And here it may be observed that it is almost the constant practice of the prophet to connect in like manner deliverances temporal with spiritual. Thus the eleventh chapter, setting forth the kingdom of Messiah, is closely connected with the tenth, which foretells the destruction of Sennacherib. So likewise the destruction of nations, enemies to God, in the thirty-fourth chapter, introduces the flourishing state of the kingdom of Christ in the thirty-fifth. And thus the chapters from xl. to xlix. inclusive, plainly relating to the deliverance from the captivity of Babylon, do in some parts plainly relate to the greater deliverance by Christ.

NOTES ON CHAP. VIII

Verse 1. Take thee a great roll-"Take unto thee a large mirror"] The word gillayon is not regularly formed from galal, to roll, but from galah, as pidyon from padah, killayon from , calah, nikkayon from nakah, elyon from alah, yod supplying the place of the radical he. galah signifies to show, to reveal; properly, as Schroederus says, (De Vestitu Mulier. Hebr. p. 294,) to render clear and bright by rubbing; to polish. gillayon, therefore, according to this derivation, is not a roll or volume: but may very well signify a polished tablet of metal, such as was anciently used for a mirror. The Chaldee paraphrast renders it by luach, a tablet, and the same word, though somewhat differently pointed, the Chaldee paraphrast and the rabbins render a mirror, Isa 3:23. The mirrors of the Israelitish women were made of brass finely polished, Ex 38:8, from which place it likewise appears that what they used were little hand mirrors which they carried with them even when they assembled at the door of the tabernacle. I have a metalline mirror found in Herculaneum, which is not above three inches square. The prophet is commanded to take a mirror, or brazen polished tablet, not like these little hand mirrors, but a large one; large enough for him to engrave upon it in deep and lasting characters, becheret enosh, with a workman's graving tool, the prophecy which he was to deliver. cheret in this place certainly signifies an instrument to write or engrave with: but charit, the same word, only differing a little in the form, means something belonging to a lady's dress, Isa 3:22, (where however five MSS. leave out the yod, whereby only it differs from the word in this place,) either a crisping-pin, which might be not unlike a graving tool, as some will have it, or a purse, as others infer from 2Ki 5:23. It may therefore be called here cheret enosh, a workman's instrument, to distinguish it from cheret ishshah, an instrument of the same name, used by the women. In this manner he was to record the prophecy of the destruction of Damascus and Samaria by the Assyrians; the subject and sum of which prophecy is here expressed with great brevity in four words, maher shalal hash baz; i.e., to hasten the spoil, to take quickly the prey; which are afterwards applied as the name of the prophet's son, who was made a sign of the speedy completion of it; Maher-shalal-hash-baz; Haste-to-the-spoil, Quick-to-the-prey. And that it might be done with the greater solemnity, and to preclude all doubt of the real delivery of the prophecy before the event, he calls witnesses to attest the recording of it.

The prophet is commanded to take a great roll, and yet four words only are to be written in it, maher shalal hash baz, Make haste to the spoil; fall upon the prey. The great volume points out the land of Judea; and the few words the small number of inhabitants, after the ten tribes were carried into captivity.

The words were to be written with a man's pen; i.e., though the prophecy be given in the visions of God, yet the writing must be real; the words must be transcribed on the great roll, that they may be read and publicly consulted. Or, cherot enosh, the pen or graver of the weak miserable man, may refer to the already condemned Assyrians, who though they should be the instruments of chastening Damascus and Samaria, should themselves shortly be overthrown. The four words may be considered as the commission given to the Assyrians to destroy and spoil the cities.

Make haste to the spoil; Fall upon the prey.

So you see, for those interested, there is a plethora of scholarly work available.

James Shewey
  • 7,767
  • 8
  • 58
  • 107
0

The most likely answer is also the simplest: the prophetess was Isaiah's wife. Whether he called her that because she prophesied or because she was his wife may be debated. But he almost certainly approached her in fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14. This is confirmed by the following passage, which borrows heavily from Isaiah 7's prediction that the threat to Judah from the kings of Syria and Israel would be rendered moot by an Assyrian invasion:

Then I made went to the prophetess, and she conceived and gave birth to a son. And the Lord said to me, “Name him Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. For before the boy knows how to say ‘My father’ or ‘My mother,’ the wealth of Damascus [Syria] and the plunder of Samaria [Israel] will be carried off by the king of Assyria.” (Is. 8:3-4)

We need not be worried that Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz is a different name than Immanuel, any more than we worry that Immanuel is a different name than Jesus.

If not his wife, then what?

But all this does not absolutely prove that the prophetess was Isaiah's wife. A possible explanation would be that he and she engaged in unmarried sex. It is tempting to rule this out because Isaiah was a prophet. But in Jewish tradition, unlike in Islam, prophets can sin. King David, who was a prophet in both Jewish and Christian traditions, committed the sin of adultery with Bathsheba, for instance. We may even speculate that Isaiah had unmarried sex with her with providential urging. The Lord works in mysterious ways. After all, Jesus' foremothers included not only Bathsheba but also Tamar, who had unmarried sex with her own father-in-law.

We may also entertain the thought that, as in the Gospel Luke, "the Holy Spirit overshadowed" the prophetess (Luke 1:35). Perhaps she was a virgin after all, and Isaiah only 'approached' her with an annunciation, as the angel approached Mary.

But all of this is pure speculation. The most likely explanation is that the prophetess was Isaiah's wife, whether she actually prophesied or not.

Dan Fefferman
  • 15,919
  • 2
  • 12
  • 62
0

From The Prophetess (wife of Isaiah)

Facts about her:

  • She was the wife of the prophet Isaiah;
  • She bore a son to Isaiah named Maher-shalal-hash-baz, which means “destruction is imminent”
  • Isaiah refers to her as “the prophetess”;
  • After Isaiah received the prophesy on Christ (chapter 7) he was commanded to write on a great roll with a “man’s pen” (perhaps meaning that it was easy to be read) the prophecy the Lord had given him about “Maher-shalal-hash-baz” (referring to the destruction which is to come to the children of Israel from Assyria). After Isaiah wrote the prophesy he “went unto the prophetess; and she conceived, and bare a son. Then said the Lord to me, Call his name Maher-shalal-hash-baz” (Isaiah 8:3);
  • In Isaiah 8: 18 Isaiah stated that “… I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and wonders in Israel…” His sons were living testaments to the coming of Jesus Christ and the future of Israel.

Speculations about her:

  • The scriptures don’t specify but it is very likely that she was also the mother of Isaiah’s other son Sherajashub, whose name means “a remnant shall return” ;
  • Since Isaiah was from upper class society it is likely that she was as well;
agarza
  • 4,297
  • 6
  • 15
  • 32
0

Concerning Isa 8:3, go back and read Isa 7:10-17. While many assumptions are made about the prophetess being Isaiah's wife, they are just that, assumptions. The Word says only that Isaiah went to the prophetess (although translations have "interpreted" going to her as sex with her). And he took two witnesses,Isa 8:2. For what reason would he take witness to a conjugal visit with his own wife. The straightforward answer requires us believing God is who He says He is and that His word is true. A virgin conceived and bore a son. This is also in keeping with three other things 1) the prophecy is fulfilled in its time (validating Isaiah as a true prophet with witnesses), 2) the Bible is testifying of itself in the repetition of a story, and 3) asserting Solomons words in Ecc 1:9-10 that nothing is new under the sun. Yes, although Jesus's birth to a virgin was miraculous and not known in its time, it apparently had happened before. God is not a God of confusion. Therefore, the prophetess must have been a virgin whose pregnancy and birth forfilled the sign He said He would give in Isa 7:14-16.

Karen
  • 1
  • 1
    As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please [edit] to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. – Community Mar 12 '24 at 06:44
-1

There are many out there who try to destroy the word of GOD by either misstating or trying to imply that GOD is not perfect. GOD - is - perfect, He is without sin, and he will not allow sin in his plans; this does not mean he will not use a sinner to do what he desires, but his plans in no way will cause a righteous man to sin. Only those who wish to discredit GOD will consider to use such tactics. GOD`S word is very easy to understand, but there are those who desire to put forth lies. If you do not fully understand what his word is saying: pray and seek the wisdom that is needed and GOD will give it to you through the HOLY SPIRIT. Those who seek the truth "will" find it

  • 1
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please [edit] to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. – Community May 01 '22 at 04:12
  • 1
    I agree God doesn’t tell people to go sin - James 1:13. In specific instances more context is needed to understand God’s role in a particular interaction. For example, which could be its own question here, did the Holy Spirit empower Samson to commit suicide? What I’m asking for is context. – Stephen May 01 '22 at 16:15
  • Here’s an interesting post about Samson https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/74717/did-samson-commit-suicide – Stephen May 01 '22 at 16:19
-2

But all this does not absolutely prove that the prophetess was Isaiah's wife. A possible explanation would be that he and she engaged in unmarried sex. It is tempting to rule this out because Isaiah was a prophet. But in Jewish tradition, unlike in Islam, prophets can sin. King David, who was a prophet in both Jewish and Christian traditions, committed the sin of adultery with Bathsheba, for instance. We may even speculate that Isaiah had unmarried sex with her with providential urging. The Lord works in mysterious ways. After all, Jesus' foremothers included not only Bathsheba but also Tamar, who had unmarried sex with her own father-in-law.

This is a candid observation by Dan Fefferman. I would not presume to say it is the case; however, to assume that there is proof she was his wife is equally tenuous. The problem (if there is one) is in needing to have an answer for everything in scripture, leaving no room for ambiguity. One can be content in not knowing. If we were given a guide that is perfect in word and sense we would not need to walk by faith, and instead be walking by sight. This is to mistake the map for the destination. A common heresy found among many Christians is the idea that it is by obedience to a moral code one finds one's salvation. God is a law giver, we obey or pay the price. This is OT theology and ignores the enlightened teachings of St. Paul on love and grace, as well as St. James and others thoughout salvation history. Having all the answers makes one smug, self righteous and semi-Pelagian, even while denying this implicitly in defense of one's orthopraxy. What is the relevance of a self-serving recreation of history to suit one's personal biases to soothe a bad conscience, perhaps, or provide a dubious consolation to allay anxiety, if what really counts is our love of God and neighbor?

Nhi
  • 3,421
  • 4
  • 15
  • 1
    You seem to have borrowed your first paragraph from Dan Fefferman – Stephen Disraeli Mar 04 '23 at 18:17
  • Plagiarism is not looked at kindly here. Please [edit] your answer to express your own ideas. – agarza Mar 04 '23 at 21:03
  • @Robert I have edited your post and placed the first paragraph in block quotes, as I believe is your intention. Welcome to BHSE. Please take the [tour] to see how this site is different from others and read the tips on [answer]. – Nhi Mar 10 '23 at 15:34