Why write uint256 instead of uint if they're the same thing?

Question

Is uint the same as uint256 in Solidity?

If this is the case, then why do a lot smart contracts make extensive use of uint256 and not just write uint instead? Is this merely to be explicit?

score 28 · Accepted Answer · answered Mar 19 '18 at 22:50

Yes, they are exact aliases.

Some developers (including me) prefer to use uint256 because it is consistent with other uint data types, which also specify their size, and also because making the size of the data explicit reminds the developer and the reader how much data they've got to play with, which may help prevent or detect bugs.

Some other languages have left out the bare uint version for just these reasons. For example, Bamboo only has uint256.

Miguel Mota · Answer 2 · 2019-12-14T17:57:11.973

10

In addition to what @EdmundEdgar said, it's also better to be explicit when constructing method signature ID's.

For example if doing bytes4(keccak('transfer(address, uint)')), you'll get a different method sig ID than bytes4(keccak('transfer(address, uint256)')) and smart contracts will only understand the latter when comparing method sig IDs.

edited Dec 14 '19 at 17:57

answered Dec 14 '19 at 01:12

Miguel Mota

5,143
29
47

Don't be so self demeaning, your answer is superior. – Qwerty Jan 19 '22 at 19:35

score 2 · Answer 3 · answered Mar 19 '18 at 21:03

2

I hate to say RTFM, but this one was too trivial. "uint and int are aliases for uint256 and int256, respectively." --https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.4.21/types.html#value-types

answered Mar 19 '18 at 21:03

Fred Douglis

279
2
11

Thanks. I was actually reading that exact page and missed it unfortunately. But in any case, I assumed they were the same, but am still unclear why people use uint256 instead of uint in contracts? I see this a lot and it seems unnecessary – Elie Steinbock Mar 19 '18 at 21:44
When I googled it, I came across a hit for an app that was changing all instances of uint to uint256. I'm guessing the reason is to avoid incompatibility if, at some point in the future, the meaning of uint changes to uint512 or something. Much like C and "long" v "long long" v "int" or "short". – Fred Douglis Mar 19 '18 at 21:47
PS. I've been using uint, myself ... – Fred Douglis Mar 19 '18 at 21:48
@EliezerSteinbock people use uint256 either to be explicit with their code in case of any changes to the alias of uint and it's visually easier to read. – ReyHaynes Mar 19 '18 at 22:05

score 1 · Answer 4 · answered Sep 26 '19 at 14:04

1

I think it's best to use uint256. It brings about readability and consistency in your code, and it allows you to adhere to best practices in smart contracts.

answered Sep 26 '19 at 14:04

SirPhemmiey

161
1
1

score 0 · Answer 5 · answered Nov 15 '22 at 12:34

0

I'll leave something related in case you want to see another example of the consequences of using uint.

https://medium.com/@mattaereal/jackpot-or-honeypot-a-quick-lesson-on-solcs-uint-and-function-selectors-cc1ea7f6afce

answered Nov 15 '22 at 12:34

matta

351
2
8

Why write uint256 instead of uint if they're the same thing?

5 Answers5