Delete an entry from mapping vs. setting it to zero

Question

In most ERC721 setApprovalForAll() implementations, to revoke approval, the mapping is set to 0, instead of deleting the entry. I wonder what happens if many users have many approvals revoked, wouldn't deleting save a lot of storage in the mapping?

To put it into code, it would look like I have a mapping:

mapping(address => mapping(address => bool)) private _operatorApprovals;

What is the difference between delete _operatorApprovals[owner][operator]; and _operatorApprovals[owner][operator] = 0;

Thank you in advance.

Update/Answer

1. delete is the same as setting to default value. StackExchange.
2. mapping does not keep track of the keys, nor does it have a length. Medium.

Answer 1

delete _operatorApprovals[owner][operator] is the same as _operatorApprovals[owner][operator] = 0 because there is no null value in Solidity and setting the value to 0 is the same as deleting it.

See: Why set value to 0 rather than deleting it?

Answer 2

It is the same in Solidity. Deleting the value or setting the value as 0