Version 8 Solidity: Difference between call with {…} (abi.encodeWithSignature(…), value) and call (abi.encodeWithSignature(…), value)

Question

I have got following SC:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
pragma solidity ^0.8.7;
//https://www.zupzup.org/smart-contract-interaction/
import "contracts/CalleeVer8.sol";
contract Caller {
    function someAction(address addr) public returns(uint) {
        Callee c = Callee(addr);
        return c.getValue(100);
    }
function storeAction(address addr) public returns(uint) {
    Callee c = Callee(addr);
    c.storeValue(100);
    return c.getValues();
}


function someUnsafeAction(address addr) public {
         (bool  result,)=addr.call{value: 10, gas: 5000}( abi.encodeWithSignature("storeValue(uint256)", 100) );
          if(result==false) {
             //Call result processing
          }
}

}

Please guide me what is the difference between: (1) (bool result,)=addr.call{value: 10, gas: 5000}( abi.encodeWithSignature("storeValue(uint256)", 100) ); And (2) (bool result,)=addr.call(abi.encodeWithSignature("storeValue(uint256)", 100) ); ?

In case of (1), why I am not getting the error if the Calleee contract shown below does not have fallback () or receiver() function:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
pragma solidity ^0.8.3;
contract Callee {
    uint[] public values;
function getValue(uint initial) public returns(uint) {
    return initial + 150;
}
function storeValue(uint value) public {
    values.push(value);
}
function getValues() public returns(uint) {
    return values.length;
}

}