I am trying to fill in this sentence:
“My company is looking to ___ a consultant”.
Is the correct term “hire” or is there a different word that is more fitting when talking about a consultant?
Asked
Active
Viewed 790 times
12
Mari-Lou A
- 91,183
dmr
- 2,710
-
4"Hire" is fine. That's what people do when they ask me to edit a paper. They send me the paper, give me a deadline, and pay me for the work. Even temporary work warrants using "hire". Another word is "engage" (= "hire for job" [thesaurus.com]), but that's not particularly American English. "Employ" is a third, but "hire" is probably the most common. – Oct 22 '12 at 15:29
4 Answers
11
Hire is appropriate for a consultant, or more generally for any kind of temporary worker. I’ve also heard “bring in/on a consultant” more than once, which sounds good to me—it conveys more of the “stop in for a few and help out” nature of consulting, I think.
Jon Purdy
- 32,386
-
2
-
1@Andrew: Bring in also works, and seems to be more common, actually. With on might be a thing pecular to the US, or my area of it. – Jon Purdy Oct 22 '12 at 16:58
-
I agree with Andrew; for me "bring on" is akin to "bring aboard", implying longer-term employment than "bring in". – ruakh Oct 23 '12 at 01:34
6
Retain is a good word for this, often used in official contexts. Historically, it has been used to refer to the hiring of legal services. That historical context helps emphasise that a specific service has been paid for (rather than a person employed permanently) and that the term of service may be temporary, with a specific goal in mind.
itsbruce
- 3,607
-
This isn't quite as good, because in some contexts retain somebody means pay him a (comparatively small) fee not to do the work but to be available if he is needed. – Tim Lymington Oct 22 '12 at 21:57
-
@TimLymington That's a valid point. I'd look to make it clear in the surrounding context, or avoid using it if I couldn't. – itsbruce Oct 23 '12 at 10:44
