Do Americans find a date such as 11 Apr 2012 more readable than the ISO format 2012-04-11? The reason I ask is that there are many situations where we do not have access to the locale, and even if we do there are often no locale-sensitive formatting functions that we can use.
3 Answers
I think the ISO format (2012-04-11) will be slightly more jarring than 11 Apr 2012. However, if you're using numeric months, that might be a good thing. I suspect most Americans will associate 11-4-2012 with the 4th of November. The ISO format might make us pause, but it won't be confusing.
- 248
The U.S. military uses the 11 Apr 2012 format (DD MMM YYYY, or DD MMM YY), so as to avoid ambiguities between 4 Nov and 11 Apr (4/11 and 11/4, not necessarily respectively, depending on where you reside).
The format is more uncommon outside of military correspondence, but I don't think anyone would tell you that such a date is "less readable" – maybe "less familiar."
- 58,828
- 5
- 95
- 196
American date format is mm/dd/yyyy but you are talking about dd/MMM/yyyy which doesn't match with American date format.
- 131
DD MMM YYpotentially almost as ambigious asDD/MM/YY? Take11 Apr 12for example; in ISO 8601 parlace, is that equal to 2011-04-12 or 2012-04-11?DD MMM YYYYis pretty hard to misread:11 Apr 2012is clearly the same day as2012-04-11(assuming of course that you are familiar with the ISO 8601 date format). – user Apr 11 '12 at 11:36DD MMM YYto11 Apr 12), but the potential for ambiguity between a two-digit day (DD) and two-digit year (YY). – user Apr 16 '12 at 11:46