I'm confused. I'm reviewing this grammar book of exercises relating to things like recognizing parts of speech. The book includes the the solutions at the end.
One of the exercises is to read a paragraph and circle the adverbs and underline the verb/adjective/adverb that they describe. Here's a sentence from the paragraph, with the adverbs in bold and the things they describe in italics. This was pulled from the solutions section.
I'm really confused, are "best" and "most" truly adverbs?
[He] remains one of the world's best known and most translated authors.
Ad verb literally means "at verb", which means it attaches to the verb. I can see from the sentence structure that these attach to… verbs, but then verbs in gerund form and verbs in participle form take the role of other parts of speech (yay, English), so then it becomes a slippery slope. Then there are linking verbs, like with "john is happy", in which if I draw the dependency parse, "happy" attaches to the verb (it can't exist if I drop the verb, I can't say "John happy"): then is "happy" an adverb too in that sentence, since it is "at the verb"?
I find that there are plenty of these exceptions from the rule "at the verb, ergo adverb", so why wouldn't "best" in "best known" be an exception too? Isn't "known" kind of an adjective? Just like in some grammar books "which" is an adjective, even though it's definitely a pronoun (yay, English).
So what exactly is the rule according to which a word is an adverb? Cause "it attaches to the verb in the dependency parse" doesn't seem to be it.
– Mihai Danila Jan 05 '24 at 00:29