What do you make of the following BBC News headline:
Man convicted of murdering his girlfriend and their 10-month-old daughter at Winchester Crown Court
Is it just me, or does this read as if the murders were committed at the court?
What do you make of the following BBC News headline:
Man convicted of murdering his girlfriend and their 10-month-old daughter at Winchester Crown Court
Is it just me, or does this read as if the murders were committed at the court?
Yes. The meaning is understood, but a decent editor would have dropped the place reference from the headline. It adds nothing and introduces ambiguity.
To recast the sentence for clarity, I would suggest:
Man convicted at Winchester Crown Court of murdering his girlfriend and their 10-month-old daughter
That puts the money words ("murdering" "girlfriend" "daughter") at too far a remove from the beginning of the headline, however, so it is easy to see why the editor chose to put the place reference at the end. As I say, however, this information seems to belong more in body copy than in a headline.
Another possible headline would be "Winchester Crown Court convicts man of murdering his girlfriend and their 10-month-old daughter". I agree, though, that mentioning the court at all seems quite unnecessary.
No, you and many other people choose to ignore the rules of implicature. and wilfully misinterpret the sentence, for comic effect.