0

I heard a native speaker say

I built an eight-figure company going on nine and I don't neccesarily think I've ever worked hard.

What does "going on nine" mean?

KillingTime
  • 6,206

1 Answers1

1

Non-native speakers may not find this easily, thinking it is based on verbal "going". However:

Cambridge

going on: adverb, preposition

informal (UK also going on for): nearly or almost (a particular number, age, time, or amount):
It was going on midnight when we left the party.
There were going on 200 people at their wedding.

The use of 8 in relation to "figure" directs the reader to the idea of value rather than age. Had age been the topic of interest, it would have read "... 8 years going on 9".

So 8 going on 9 means that the present worth of the company is tens of millions (8 digits; e.g. $85,000,00), but it is nearly hundreds of millions (9 digits; e.g. $120,000,000).

Anton
  • 28,634
  • 3
  • 42
  • 81
  • Thanks for more explanation. I wonder what if one wants to express the meaning that the company is going soon to be nine years old, can "going on" be used anyway? – brianmail Feb 14 '22 at 12:20
  • I wonder why can't "going on nine" in my question interpreted as the company going to be nine years old. Could anybody please help me out? – brianmail Feb 14 '22 at 14:54
  • I am eight going on nine implies age. But once I say eight-figure, I refer to valuation alone. So eight-figure company going on nine refers to figures. – Yosef Baskin Feb 14 '22 at 16:00
  • I have edited the answer to deal with the (unlikely) possibility of years of age rather than value. – Anton Feb 14 '22 at 16:45
  • Thanks, Anton. You've explained pretty clearly. – brianmail Feb 14 '22 at 17:06
  • Welcome to the site. The question was closed because it led to a duplication in a previous answer. Like many such closures, there was an aspect (in this case quite small - the years/value ambiguity) that was not dealt with by the duplicate answer. However, do not be discouraged by this; it is just one of the quirks of the site. Come again. – Anton Feb 14 '22 at 17:48