So I read a novel and found a sentence "Jane waited on her boss's instructions". Does the sententence mean that Jane was waiting for her boss's instructions?
Asked
Active
Viewed 40 times
0
-
The expression 'wait on' is ambiguous; context only makes the 'wait, prepared to act upon' sense more probable rather than certain here. It could merely mean 'waited for' (where I'd say the multi-word verb status is dubious). It's rarely used in this context nowadays, being largely confined to restaurants etc and the set phrase 'waited on hand and foot'. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 18 '19 at 12:00
1 Answers
-1
Not exactly. To 'wait on' is a phrase with a different meaning to 'wait for':
1.4: Remain in readiness for a purpose.
When combined with a person, particularly a superior one, 'waiting on someone' means doing things for them, like a servant (or secretary, in your example).
Consider a waiter at a restaurant - a waiter waits at the tables, and waits on the customers:
- ‘The only member of that group who will wait on tables next Sunday is Sean Carroll who has served at all of the 45 parties.’
- ‘I felt like a fraud, sitting in a pleasant room, served three delicious meals a day and being waited on by quietly efficient and obviously busy staff who even spoke a little English.’
- ‘He then worked as an electronic appliance technician before switching to blue-collar jobs such as waiting on restaurant tables and selling audio equipment.’
Examples from Lexico
marcellothearcane
- 7,841
-
1
-
1@marcellothearcane But the secretary is not "waiting on her boss", she's "waiting on instructions" (from her boss). – Hellion Sep 18 '19 at 12:09
-
-
To 'wait on' is * a string with the same meaning as 'wait for': [Lexico, under 'wait'] (your link): wait... 1.1 wait for or on : Stay where one is or delay action until (someone) arrives or is ready. / ‘he sits on the corner waiting for Mary’ / ‘she was waiting on her boyfriend’. (but not my downvote; I usually consider one enough for a well-intentioned, researched, but somewhat one-sided answer). *also – Edwin Ashworth Sep 18 '19 at 13:25