0

There is an exercise in Raymond Murphy's book on reported speech. In Exercise 48.1, all the answers have been given in past form. However, at Unit 48.A, there is written that

It is not always necessary to change the verb in reported speech. If you report something and the situation hasn't changed, you do not need to change the verb to the past.

1 Answers1

1

This is interesting to me, as my opinion has always been that the tense should shift backwards to an appropriate tense (in other words, any continuous tense would still be continuous; the same applies to perfect and simple). However, a quick Google seems to yield the result that there are a few situations where one might choose not to shift tense backwards.

(The following website I have never heard of before, but is the highest hit [about 4] that covers this topic when I google 'don't always change tense in reported speech'.)

The website, English Outside the Box, states there are some scenarios where we shouldn't (or at any rate may choose not to) backshift:

1) when something was just said (around the same moment as repeating the information)

2) for scientific facts and general truths

3) for information that is still true

  • I rarely upvote answers to duplicates that have already been identified as such (quite the opposite), but this is a very good treatment. – Edwin Ashworth Mar 16 '18 at 11:33