0

Is this sentence a relative clause? There is a nice aquarium called blue sky at there..

Because if it's relative clause, it is subjective pronoun and we have to mention ( which is ) at the sentence..

There is a nice aquarium which is called blue sky at there..

Daniel
  • 13
  • 1
    First, at there is ungrammatical. Just say there, no at. Second, a whole sentence can't be* a relative clause; but a sentence can contain a relative clause. Third, relative clauses can be reduced by Whiz-deletion, as happened here. – John Lawler Dec 16 '16 at 20:56
  • As mentioned above, drop the word "at"; then at least you'll have a grammatical sentence to work with. To answer your question: no, "called Blue Sky" is not a relative clause; it's a past-participial clause modifying "nice aquarium". But non-finite clauses like this are semantically similar to relatives, cf. There is a nice aquarium there which is called Blue Sky. – BillJ Dec 16 '16 at 22:25

1 Answers1

0

I assume you're asking whether the phrase "called blue sky" is a relative clause. No, it's not. In fact, it's not a clause at all. To be a clause, it would have to have both a subject and a predicate. As you point out, a relative clause begins with a relative pronoun (e.g., "which"). That pronoun serves as the subject.

"Called blue sky" is a participial phrase directly modifying "aquarium." It works in the sentence more or less like an adjective, except that we find it after the noun it's modifying instead of before.

Amos J. Hunt
  • 54