24

What is the shortest comprehensive sentence in English?

chanchal1987
  • 1,866
  • 7
    Voting to close on the grounds this is not a constructive question. A sentence could be, for example, an answer to someone asking "What's the first [or n'th] letter of the alphabet?" – FumbleFingers Jul 17 '11 at 13:32
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers Well true in an orthographic sense, but not in terms of grammar, where we often distinguish fragments from sentences. A one-word reply such as "cheese" or "two" would normally thus be considered a fragment, not a sentence :) – Araucaria - Him Jul 02 '15 at 14:19
  • 5
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not constructive. – Edwin Ashworth Jul 02 '15 at 14:40
  • Implied subjects, however obvious the context might make them are not a component of the sentence, therefore rendering the sentence incomplete for lack of a subject. Context might make the complete thought obvious and at times, getting the gist of your thought across in a timely manner is preferable to absolute clarity, hence the "imperative". However the purpose of a "complete sentence" as it is usually meant, is that it linguistically conveys an entire thought without ambiguity and that is something imperative sentences do not do by themselves. How would someone measure context anyway? – Tonepoet Jul 02 '15 at 16:27
  • 1
    @Tonepoet one could argue language can never convey an entire thought without ambiguity. I'd say a sentence is complete when it is possible to understand. – jiggunjer Dec 21 '16 at 07:56

17 Answers17

47

"Go."

The understood subject is "You". "[You] go" makes sense to me.

35

One could argue that in certain contexts, the single letter "I" is a sentence (depending on your definition of a sentence):

"Who is it?"

"I"

This (one letter) is the shortest possible, unless you count the "empty utterance". ;-)

ShreevatsaR
  • 27,572
  • 4
    Shouldn't it be "Me."? Short for "It is me." – Picturepocket Sep 14 '10 at 18:04
  • 11
    You could also say "I" if someone asks, "what is the ninth letter of the alphabet?" – Kosmonaut Sep 14 '10 at 19:20
  • 14
    @Picturepocket: No, because it's actually short for "It is I." A predicate nominative is grammatically supposed to be the subjective form of the pronoun (e.g. "I", "he") as opposed to the objective form ("me", "him"), despite the fact that casual English often uses the latter. – Maulrus Sep 14 '10 at 19:45
  • Also a shorter form of "I am", where "am" is understood in response to a question. – tsilb Aug 09 '11 at 16:35
  • @Picturepocket, one way to check is determine which is correct in a group, and vice versa. So "It is Joe and I" is the correct form, therefore "It is I" is correct. No, as correct as it sounds, you don't say "It is Joe and me". – Arlen Beiler Aug 09 '12 at 23:22
  • Is "I" a valid written English sentence without punctuation? – Victor Stoddard May 07 '19 at 22:09
  • Incorrect due to lack of a period. – B. Findlay Dec 15 '20 at 22:00
18

It is said both the longest and the shortest sentence comes from the wedding ceremony:

I do.

Paola
  • 3,129
14

"Be!"

The verb "to be" in the imperative mood. Though it's the same number of letters as "Go!", I'd say it wins as it comes first alphabetically. ;)

Charlie
  • 6,077
14

"No!" works perfectly, in my opinion.

kitukwfyer
  • 3,753
14

This.

That is the shortest, in number of words, complete English sentence that directly answers your question.

RedGrittyBrick
  • 10,147
  • 32
  • 46
9

I don't know if it even qualifies in this context, but according to the story, an author (variously Oscar Wilde or Victor Hugo), wondering how his new book was selling, sent a single-character telegram to his publisher:

?

The reply was

!

that is, well.

pavium
  • 3,344
7

The shortest sentence in the entire English Language, is the reply:

I.

It is a reply to the question: "Who is it?" Reply: "I."

That's shorter than "Go!"

Thursagen
  • 41,919
6

I would vote for "I am."

4

"I sentence you to time already served. You are free to go."

3

"O!"

As a variant of the exclamation "Oh!", an interjection of fear, surprise, admiration, etc.

Hugo
  • 67,535
2

?

Even better than that, contemplate (the pithy, wholly implied) section 7.1 of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (as translated from the original German):

whuber
  • 451
  • 4
  • 8
1

Since you already have many sweet, and short, answers I can only speculate on your intentions and provide, possibly, interesting link to one word sentences.

Unreason
  • 12,446
1

It obviously can't be less than three letters (**.) and still be a complete thought.

  • Go.
  • Hi!
  • Ho! (same as "Hi")

This doesn't include responses since they require other sentences.

Arlen Beiler
  • 2,047
  • 7
    And if we are talking about the shortest spoken complete sentence, then something like Cut. could be the shortest, because [kʊt] just has a single lax vowel and two stops, while "go" [goʊ], "hi" [haɪ], and "ho" [hoʊ] are all diphthongs, which makes them take a fraction of a second longer to say :) – Kosmonaut Sep 14 '10 at 19:29
  • 3
    A period is not a letter, it is a punctuation mark. – Oldcat Mar 01 '14 at 01:33
0

Eh?

Used to represent a sound made in speech, especially one used to express enquiry, surprise, or to elicit agreement

[ODO]

Ste
  • 14,234
0

It depends on how you define sentence and then how you define shortest. The answer does not appear to be Go, though (although that's quite a good shot at an answer).

The question uses the phrase complete sentence from which we can probably assume that the Original Poster is referring to a fully grammatical utterance headed by a finite verb.

With regards to shortest, there are at least two ways we could measure this. We could do it orthographically, in which case the sentence with the fewest letters would probably be the imperative of the verb 'X' (pronounced /eks/). Although usually used transitively, as in the Mark Twain quote:

  • 'I shell have to x this ere paragrab,' said he to himself, as he read it over.'

... it could easily be used intransitively too:

  • A. What shall I do now?
  • B. X! [meaning "start crossing out"]

However, although 'X' contains only one orthographic symbol, in terms of sound it consists of three segments: /eks/. So, if by shortest sentence, we mean shortest in terms of segments, then this word wouldn't do. The sentence Go has one consonant sound plus a diphthong - /gəʊ/ in Southern standard British English and /goʊ/ in General American. We could regard this as having either two or three segments. However, it is plainly obvious that this could be shorter. The reason is we also have a verb owe which has exactly the same sound without the /g/, namely /əʊ/ or /oʊ/. However, it is quite hard to use this verb without a following complement, and so an imperative sentence might be a bit implausible: Owe!.

A better contender in terms of segments might be the verb OOH meaning to make an ooh sound, as in the audience oohed and aahed. So if you were in the audience at one of those sitcoms where the audience were directed to laugh, clap, ooh and aah, one of the directions you might get, could feasibly be the imperative:

  • Ooh!

This fully complete one word sentence consists only of the one vowel. In phonemic script it looks like this: /u:/. This then might be a contender for the shortest sentence in English. But of course there are others. For example there is always:

  • Aah!

... which looks like this: /a:/!

  • You could also have the “ah!” of realisation, which is usually just a short /a/. Or a grunt of non-committal /m/. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Jul 04 '15 at 11:06
  • 2
    @JanusBahsJacquet But would that count as a sentence as opposed to a fragment? – Araucaria - Him Jul 04 '15 at 11:56
  • If you're ordering the same audience to make a non-committal sound, sure. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Jul 04 '15 at 11:59
  • @JanusBahsJacquet I see, hmmm, possibly, but I reckon that might have to be give us an 'mm' or something :) – Araucaria - Him Jul 04 '15 at 12:00
  • @JanusBahsJacquet I was wondering if a word with a short vowel followed by a fortis consonant might be shorter still - i.e. the fortis consonant would clip the length of the vowel considerably. And if it was a stop, the length of the hold phase wouldn't really count as part of the audible word ? What d'you reckong? – Araucaria - Him Jul 04 '15 at 12:14
  • Depends on whether you’re talking number of phonemes, number of morae, or actual time of utterance in ms, I suppose. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Jul 04 '15 at 12:21
  • @Araucaria Eh? . . . . . – StoneyB on hiatus Jun 14 '16 at 14:41
  • @StoneyB No verb there! ; ) Unless Eh? is a pro-sentence meaning What did you just say? I saw an argument like that somewhere once (not about eh though). I thought you might want to add that to your pro-form list of proform thingies. – Araucaria - Him Jun 14 '16 at 14:44
-1

No.

Also

Q: Which is the fifth letter of the alphabet? A: E.

Midhat
  • 2,811