3

When is the definite article the appropriate before an abstract noun? In particular, I have the following examples.

Which are correct?

Case I

  1. In the Theorem 4.4, we prove property A for all graphs.
  2. In Theorem 4.4, we prove property A for all graphs.

Case II

  1. From the Theorem 4.4, we know about property A for all graphs.
  2. From Theorem 4.4, we know about property A for all graphs.

Case III

  1. From the following Theorem, we know about property A for all graphs.
  2. From following Theorem, we know about property A for all graphs.
rogermue
  • 13,878
Jardine
  • 143
  • 6
    You're mixing up abstract nouns and proper nouns (i.e. names): "Theorem 4.4" is a proper noun, the name of a specific object, and so does not take an article. Later, when you refer to "Theorem", without the 4.4 (rendering it non-specific), it's a standard noun, and so should not be capitalized, and requires an article. In that particular case, you want the definite article: "the thereom [we were just discussing]". – Dan Bron Nov 25 '14 at 12:34
  • 4
    This may be better on [ell.se] – Kris Nov 25 '14 at 12:46
  • Jardine, the question itself is required in the body, even if stated in the title. Edited. – Kris Nov 25 '14 at 12:47
  • @DanBron The confusion may be due to the unavoidable professional blindness of a mathematician or a theoretician. To me, Theorem 4.4 is an abstract mathematical object, that I can neither see nor smell nor feel with my hands. I can only hear or read the 'statement' of the theorem, that is, how it is stated, but not the theorem itself. A theorem can be stated in many ways which might not seem to be the same thing, even though they are the same. Thanks, any how. It makes sense I believe. – Jardine Nov 25 '14 at 13:03
  • 1
    Well, love is an abstract concept, yet it can take an article or not. Consider the following references from music: "Love is a many-splendored thing," "A Love Supreme," or "The love you take is equal to the love you make." – Robusto Nov 25 '14 at 13:46
  • An example of where this might get more complicated: in California, people often refer to highways with articles, like "the I-5" or even just "the Five" to refer to Interstate 5. In most other parts of the US, using an article in this manner is inappropriate. – Adam Katz Mar 07 '15 at 02:59

3 Answers3

2

I'd say, I sentence 2, II sentence 2, and III sentence 1 are correct; the latter, since dropping the in this case would yield a gap in the sentence.

Martin Peters
  • 334
1

When is the definite article the appropriate before an abstract noun?

When you are referring to a specific instance of that abstract noun, e.g. a specific idea or theorum, and aren't identifying it by e.g. following the noun with a number specific enough for the reader to know exactly which theorum you're discussing.

WBT
  • 3,544
-1

In this very case the article the is referred to an abstract noun - in this case theorem - which is already known to both speakers, i.e. they already have background knowledge about that very theorem which is determined by the article the.

Turkan Alisoy
  • 655