0

What would be grammatically correct? Would I need to use 's after "Supreme Court"?

...overruled a prior decision of the Supreme Court, defined in the...

or

...overruled a prior decision of the Supreme Court's, defined in the...

...I know I can structure the sentence in a better format as so:

...overruled a prior decision made by the Supreme Court, defined in the...

However, I want to know which one from the first two is correct.

1 Answers1

0

The complete sentence would've been helpful, but still, here you go:

...overruled a prior decision of the Supreme Court, defined in the...

Here you are using decision of the Supreme Court, so no 's required, and the sentence is correct.

...overruled a prior decision of the Supreme Court's, defined in the...

Here you are using the same of, so the 's is unnecessary. If you do want to use the 's, you have to remove the of, like:

...overruled the Supreme Court's prior decision

But as you can see, this changes the meaning of the sentence slightly. It no longer talks about a certain decision made by the Supreme Court, which was the intention of your original sentence, to begin with.

  • There is a real beauty of a subtlety here, which I just realised. The use of the possessive seems to be more "natural" when using a pronoun instead of a proper or common noun. I'll elaborate. Which of these sentences sounds more correct? "That decision of you was totally unjust!" vs "That decision of yours was totally unjust!". Now compare: "That decision of the referee was totally unjust!" vs "That decision of the referee's was totally unjust!". See what I mean? – Deepak Sep 03 '14 at 06:54
  • ... It doesn't stop there. I'd say both "That decision of the referee was totally unjust!" & "That decision of the referee's was totally unjust!" are both quite acceptable. But ??'An ally of England's'. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 03 '14 at 08:50