Do I need an apostrophe-s in reference to major concepts?
For example, I see both versions as in:
- Planck’s constant
- Planck constant
Are both forms considered correct?
Do I need an apostrophe-s in reference to major concepts?
For example, I see both versions as in:
Are both forms considered correct?
At Wolfram Alpha, if you type in either Newton Law or Newton's Law, it assumes that you mean Newton's First Law. I regularly see the possessive form, but rarely see "Newton Law."
References to the value, h, are Planck Constant or Planck's Constant, 4.135688 * 10^(-15) electron-volt seconds. Wolfram calls it by the former, but Wikipedia uses either (but is titled by the former).
Newton's law refers to a law made by Newton. Planck constant refers to a constant named after Max Planck.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology names h Planck constant. You could name it NIST's Planck constant if you want to speak about it in contrast to the way other people defined it.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology provides the official name for the Planck constant and Planck's constant seems to be an obsolete term that's still in use.
Additional there's a "Newtonian constant of gravitation" instead of a "Newton constant of gravitation". As a result you probably would want to use the Newtonian law if you speak about someone's reformulation of Newton's law. You also have Newtonian physics instead of Newton physics or Newton's physics.