2

The terms "screw up" and "crap" are frequently used on American TV that I'm not sure whether they're euphemisms, my first assumption, or just vulgar.

I don't want to make mistakes, especially when speaking to children, but after doing some research, I found no definitive answer.

Are these terms euphemisms or just vulgar?

I found this explanations:

"screw up" is offensive in the UK, but just slang in the US. The translation in my language is vulgar or euphemistic, depending on whether they're being translated from UK or US English.

"crap" is considered mildly offensive, but the translations are both euphemistic and very vulgar.

Can I use these terms when speaking with children or with, for example, my father-in-law?

Kit Z. Fox
  • 27,819
FdT
  • 296
  • 2
  • 8
  • Make an effort to find answers and let us know where you searched and what you found. 2. Take advice on how to write your question without errors. (Perhaps ask your teacher to correct the mistakes.)
  • – Kris May 11 '13 at 10:56
  • Offensive & vulgar versus euphemism depends upon who's making the judgment. You won't find any definitive answer anywhere about social judgments of words, only about legal judgments in cases decided by the courts or regulatory commissions like the USA's FCC. When I was in high school in the US, the principal told me & my friend Neil that we had used forbidden language over the PA system: in our lunchtime skit, we said "What the heck?" Heck's a euphemism for "Hell", he said, & "Hell" is not permitted, so "heck" isn't either. Neil & I were shocked. But the principal was a bluenose. –  May 11 '13 at 11:01
  • just a question, why "can" goes after "I" in the question "I can use this terms speaking with children?" ? – FdT May 11 '13 at 12:13
  • @FdT: It doesn't go after "I" in a question. It goes before "I" in a question. The question mark itself is not enough; inversion is also required. Some people apparently think the question mark is a question particle like Mandarin ma or Malay -kah, but it's not; it's just punctuation, and punctuation is silent. – John Lawler May 11 '13 at 15:33
  • Thank you, John. Indeed. So, there was an error made by editing that now is been correct. – FdT May 11 '13 at 15:56
  • @user21497: OP didn't ask whether vulgar versus euphemism depended on who's making the judgment. The vulgar often so plead. So what? You're still perturbed by something your principal said, how many years ago? Heck, that must have really gotten under your skin. In formal writing, even an otherwise vulgar person might wish to be sure that his or her language connoted nothing he or she did not mean it to connote. It's called: considering the audience. – thb Jun 20 '17 at 16:15