39

Sometimes we stack rectangular object like books, paper slips, bricks, video cassettes, etc in a way that one is put in a landscape orientation and the other in a portrait orientation.

What is called this way of stacking?

I want to fill in the blanks with that term:

  • You can stack more books if you put them in a/ an ___ manner.

  • Please make 25 sets of copies of pages 1-10 from this book, then collate the copies so that each set is bundled separately. I suggest to stack them in a/ an___manner.

enter image description here

Soudabeh
  • 1,451
  • 4
  • 19
  • 30
  • 2
    Does this happen to have a name/word in your native language? – Em. Jul 06 '16 at 20:18
  • 2
    Similar but not same: I have used copy machines that put successive sets in the output bin SHIFTED perhaps an inch left and right, but NOT ROTATED, and they called this 'offset stacking' or just 'offset output'. – dave_thompson_085 Jul 06 '16 at 20:58
  • 1
    @Soudabeh Max is American. You'd better answere: no we don't have a name or word for it. But we use some phrases to desctibe it. –  Jul 06 '16 at 21:22
  • 1
    It's not even a consistent pattern! Both the top two books are 180° out of line with the pattern established by the bottom five. Even if there was a word for the (consistent) pattern, it would be a foolish engineer who assumed OP's picture reflects that pattern. – FumbleFingers Jul 06 '16 at 21:41
  • @FumbleFingers, how should I edit my question? Maybe I shouldn't have used "pattern" in my example. I just put my own books on each other in this manner and took a picture to show what I'm talking about. – Soudabeh Jul 06 '16 at 21:47
  • 1
    @Soudabeh: I didn't mean to imply the question itself is badly posed. Actually, the fact that you composed the picture yourself implies you're not bothered about full 360° "symmetry". Thinking about it, I'd bet any money you could create a higher stack if you had that 180° twist on every "other other" book, since collectively the spine sides would probably measure slightly more (or maybe less, I'm certainly no expert on the art of competitive book-stacking! :) – FumbleFingers Jul 06 '16 at 22:43
  • 1
    ...although The Guinness Book of Records has an entry for Tallest *Pancake* Stack, they don't seem to have one for *books*. So maybe with a combination of your original idea and my refinement, we can set the bar high for the first record! – FumbleFingers Jul 06 '16 at 22:50
  • @FumbleFingers, Thanks for your scrutinizing observation. You are completely right. :) I'll take another picture. – Soudabeh Jul 07 '16 at 04:31
  • 4
    It's a Jenga pattern =) – Nayuki Jul 07 '16 at 05:17
  • No human being would stack books like this. (a)symmetrical book stacking – Mazura Jul 09 '16 at 02:25

15 Answers15

28

Perhaps crisscross: "to form a pattern on (something) with lines that cross each other" or crossways.

No More Secrets
  • 516
  • 4
  • 4
  • 6
    Crossways is the best suggestion so far, but alternately crossways might better emphasise the "one one way, one the other way" concept. – JavaLatte Jul 07 '16 at 01:55
  • 2
    I just found this: http://acordofwood.net/firewood/cord-wood-stacking-firewood/, "...each row is perpendicular to the row beneath it." – Soudabeh Jul 07 '16 at 14:51
  • 4
    These feel more BrE than AmE to me (which I only mention for complete clarity, not to say BrE answers are not good answers). Certainly cossways is a word I think I've never heard anyone use in person. When I hear or see criss-cross I can only think of Strangers on a Train, but beyond that criss-cross makes me personally think of an X pattern and I would more likely use it for something that is mixed up, rather than organized. – Todd Wilcox Jul 07 '16 at 16:30
  • 3
    'Crossways' sounds wacky to my (American) ears. Not even sure what that means. I would guess it might mean what you're intending it to mean, but just because 'cross' is in it. – DCShannon Jul 08 '16 at 02:16
  • 1
    @ToddWilcox but if you look at the stack from the top, it does form an X (admittedly an extremely fat-legged one, but still). – Hellion Jul 08 '16 at 20:12
21

I don't think English has a single word for this which is unambiguous. I think it would be best to say something like:

I suggest stacking them in a criss-cross pattern, alternating between portrait and landscape orientations.

Or:

Stack them in a criss-cross pattern, with each one being a quarter-turn from the one below it.

Tanner Swett
  • 5,822
  • 15
  • 27
  • 1
    +1 for suggesting further explanation because none of the single word suggestions are particularly clear without it. – Karen Jul 07 '16 at 17:22
  • 3
    I don't know if you need 'portrait' and 'landscape', those might be confusing, but "alternating orientation" seems like the best description on the page. – DCShannon Jul 08 '16 at 02:17
14

Staggered is a good word for it meaning an arrangement of things in a zigzag order so they are not in line

Jon
  • 149
  • 2
13

Rotate Offset is the term used by HP to define the feature of their printer that allows users to print multiple copies of a job in alternate orientations.

Rotating Collate is the term used by Ricoh in which every other print set is rotated by 90 degrees.

gattsbr
  • 366
  • 2
  • 12
  • 1
    Please [edit] to include an explanation of why this is correct, rather than just linking to other sites; answers without explanation do not teach the patterns of the language well. – Nathan Tuggy Jul 07 '16 at 17:14
  • 1
    Thanks, @gattsbr. +1 As for my second example, can I say "collate them in a rotating manner."? – Soudabeh Jul 07 '16 at 17:16
  • 2
    @Soudabeh first as Tanner Swett answer states: "I don't think English has a single word for this which is unambiguous." That being said, I see nothing wrong with "collate them in a rotating manner.", especially in the context of handouts. – gattsbr Jul 07 '16 at 17:36
  • @gattsbr, thanks again. By the way, down vote is not from me. – Soudabeh Jul 07 '16 at 17:43
  • 1
    The people that down-vote your answer are unlikely to see your comment. It's best just to ignore it and pay attention to the folks that have taken the time to give you feedback. Now that you've edited your answer to incorporate @NathanTuggy 's suggestion, you might tag him in a comment to give him the opportunity to retract his DV (if it is his - it may not be). – ColleenV Jul 07 '16 at 20:56
  • @ColleenV I'll assume you've done that for me now, thanks =P, but I was figuring his down-vote(if he did) wasn't the one I was looking at. (1-1 != -1) – gattsbr Jul 07 '16 at 21:26
  • Not a DV, but surely this refers only to the orientation of the print on the paper... not the stacks of paper themselves? – underscore_d Jul 10 '16 at 09:02
  • 1
    @underscore_d this refers to the orientation of the paper(or set thereof) inside of a stack of papers(or set thereof). The orientation of the print on the paper would still be defined as portrait or landscape based on the settings for the content of the document. – gattsbr Jul 10 '16 at 19:28
7

I can't think of a single word, but "alternating directional pattern" fits well.

UnhandledExcepSean
  • 326
  • 1
  • 7
7

You could say to stack them alternating from portrait to landscape.

to interchange repeatedly and regularly with one another in time or place; rotate (usually followed by with):

Dictionary.com

SGR
  • 471
  • 2
  • 5
  • 3
    +1 for "alternating" but I feel like the words portrait and landscape would confuse me if the question is not about printing things. Certainly when it is books that are stacked, as in the image in the question, those two words would confuse me. – Todd Wilcox Jul 07 '16 at 16:27
4

Interleaving

Verb

  1. (transitive) To intersperse (something) at regular intervals between the parts of a thing
AllInOne
  • 409
  • 3
  • 8
  • 9
    Without proper context provided, this could be mistaken for interleaving the pages of the books – valbaca Jul 06 '16 at 20:21
4

You can stack more books if you put them in a/ an ___ manner.

Please make 25 sets of copies of pages 1-10 from this book, then collate the copies so that each set is bundled separately. I suggest to stack them in a/ an___manner.

If you want a one word term, staggered or criss-cross seem closest but not acceptable at conveying what you want to express. Criss-cross would imply that the papers are intersecting each other making a cross pattern. Staggered implies that each set will be aligned differently, but doesn't give any more information as to how they are aligned.

I suggest "stagger the sets in horizontal-vertical alignment" or "stack the sets in a portrait-landscape stagger"... and even with these there is probably a need for extra instruction. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Leo
  • 901
  • 6
  • 11
3

I would suggest crosswise staggered. Staggered means that each item (normally an unbound set of pages) is kept together so it can be picked up on its own easily. In a context where that is an issue, like making copies, this explains the purpose so even if it’s not understood exactly, the listener will do something appropreate and useful to the task.

For books, if the listener seems puzzled, add “…like when making copies.” This gives contextual clues to what staggered means.

JDługosz
  • 473
  • 2
  • 10
2

Stacked in a "checkered" pattern is a candidate. Basket-weave is another one!
Admittedly both words are not very common but would do the job!

kamran
  • 129
  • 2
  • 7
    Both words are reasonably common, but not usually used for stacks. Rather, they're used for patterns on a surface. – Nathan Tuggy Jul 07 '16 at 05:20
1

Crosshatched is another option.

Lighthart
  • 207
  • 1
  • 2
  • 1
    Please [edit] to include an explanation of why this is correct; answers without explanation do not teach the patterns of the language well. – Nathan Tuggy Jul 08 '16 at 00:06
  • 1
    I agree with Nathan, but that being said, this sounds pretty good. I think I would know what you meant if you said to stack them crosshatched. – DCShannon Jul 08 '16 at 02:19
  • 1
    Your point is taken well, but this is a colloquialism. How should that be presented? – Lighthart Jul 08 '16 at 06:14
  • 1
    On word requests, you generally want to include a definition of the suggested word. Here is one: "To mark or shade with two or more intersecting sets of parallel lines. 1. A pattern made by such lines.". Then describe how that meaning is similar to what you're going for. – DCShannon Jul 09 '16 at 01:52
1

I don't think you will get one word for it; perhaps a phrase that captures the intent?

Perhaps - "an alternating axial/transverse pattern". But this will assume there is a frame of reference alluded to be the axial - axis...

Eniola
  • 156
  • 3
0

I am here to poke this dead zombie thread.

orthogonal "1a: intersecting or lying at right angles"

  • "You can stack more books if you arrange them orthogonally."
  • "Please make 25 sets of copies of pages 1-10 from this book, then collate the copies so that each set is bundled separately. I suggest to stack them orthogonally."
Evan LaBrant
  • 1
0

Not so much for books, but for paper print outs I've seen the term collated used

collect and combine (texts, information, or data).

"all the information obtained is being collated"

So for example, if you print out 50 copies of a 10 page document you can collate them like the above to make it easier to distribute.

RemarkLima
  • 109
  • 3
  • 3
    Collating is more the general goal that this stacking technique is used for than the actual technique itself. – Nathan Tuggy Jul 07 '16 at 06:03
  • 3
    Technically, collating just means putting the various pages of each copy together, rather than having all the pages 1s next to each other, then all page 2s, etc. It's even a concept because early copiers had no on-board memory in which to store pages, so if you wanted 50 copies, you got 50 of page 1 then 50 of page 2, etc. The fact that a set of copies are collated says nothing about how the collated copies are stacked, staggered, separated, or whatever. – Todd Wilcox Jul 07 '16 at 16:24
0

I think putting it in the simplest way can avoid ambiguity.

Thus,you can say: put the books lengthwise or widthwise.

It is unlikely you would want to stack the books in more than two configurations.

tom
  • 300
  • 1
  • 5