What is the difference between these two:
1- It seems water.
2- It seems to be water.
What is the difference between these two:
1- It seems water.
2- It seems to be water.
Seem is one of common link verbs (like be, appear, look, sound, smell, taste, feel, become, get) and it can be followed by adjectives only:
The weather is horrible.
The dish tasted delicious.
She seems excited.
Nouns can be used after seem only when it is followed by to be:
He doesn't seem to be a coward.
Or by like, which sometimes can be omitted:
It seems (like) a good place to spend the rainy night.
Also: It seems to be the place to spend a rainy night.
"It seems water* sounds most awkward to me, in comparison with "It looks (tastes, feels. ets) like water.
Seem is a linking verb that's usually followed by an adjective and an adjective + noun such as:
He seems nice.
He seems a nice man.
You can also use 'to be' after seem in these sentences, without any difference in meaning, such as:
He seems to be nice.
He seems to be a nice man.
However, if you want to use seem in front of a noun, you should use a to-infinitive. So the sentence should be as follows:
It seems to be water.
You asked using the structure of seem + noun. Yes, it's possible!
seen + noun: He seems a nice man.
No difference in those two sentences ('seems to be something' is also possible). However, I feel that the latter structure is more common. It also looks better to me as compared to the previous one.
Both appears to be correct
It seems water
and
It seems to be water
But personally, I'd prefer the latter as it sounds more appropriate and complete. If you go with the example you could see that, "It"(something) "seems to be"(looks like/appears to be) "water".