0

In the phrase below:

No one pays her any attention. They don’t even look at her direction, as if she weren’t there.

Is 'weren't' correct or should I change it to 'wasn't'?

gotube
  • 49,596
  • 7
  • 72
  • 154
Allyn
  • 3
  • 1

1 Answers1

2

Weren’t is correct as is. Colloquially, many speakers would say wasn’t, but prescriptivists object to that usage. The traditional grammatical analysis is that when discussing a statement contrary to fact (here, “She was not there”) one must use the subjunctive (so was becomes were).

One can sometimes contrast the indicative and the subjunctive. For instance, If I was there is a straight conditional; it might be followed by something like “…I have lost all recollection of it.” By contrast, If I were there introduces an irrealis; it makes sense when followed by things like “…I would not have to guess what’s going on.”

Paul Tanenbaum
  • 6,959
  • 1
  • 15
  • 33