It's time colleges helped you compare apples to apples.
(The Boston Globe)
If the time is a present moment, why does the journalist use "help" in the past tense? Or is "helped" subjunctive?
It's time colleges helped you compare apples to apples.
(The Boston Globe)
If the time is a present moment, why does the journalist use "help" in the past tense? Or is "helped" subjunctive?
My first reaction here was that this cannot be a past subjunctive, because with BE in the first or third person singular the same idiom calls for simple past WAS rather than subjunctive WERE:
It is time I was in bed.
It is time he was going.
However, a little quick Google-Booking turned up a handful of such uses as time he were and time I were down to about World War I. Moreover, a common variant of the idiom employs the modal should, which often replaces irrealis subjunctives:
It is high time this war should be ended.
So I think, Yes, this is a past subjunctive, employed to express a proposition which is not a fact (but should be). And like the past subjunctive in other cases, it has lost its distinctive forms for 1st and 3rd person singular BE:
If he was/were here he would have something to say about that.
The expression it's time can be followed by to + infinitive, for + object + to + infinitive, or subject + past tense verb.
There is no difference in meaning, other than who is being referred to -- and all 4 variations refer to present time; in #1, the referent could be the speaker or one or more listeners, depending on the context. To my ear, the subject + past tense verb construction sounds more judgmental or critical: in #3, the critical tone is directed towards the third person, a female, and in #4 reflexively towards the speaker him- or herself.