3

Since the meanings of the words harsh and hard are similar but not the same, does "harsh on" make sense?

For example:

Calm down you shouldn't be too harsh on him.

Michael Harvey
  • 71,537
  • 5
  • 105
  • 149
coolguy
  • 957
  • 1
  • 10
  • 28

2 Answers2

3

“Harsh on” may be acceptable, but “harsh to” is far more common.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Harsh+on%2C+harsh+to&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2CHarsh%20on%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Charsh%20to%3B%2Cc0

Jeff Morrow
  • 32,084
  • 25
  • 58
  • 3
    I think these can have different uses. One is harsh to a friend, but harsh on their children, for example. (In that case, it's more common to say one is hard on their children, but I think harsh works too.) – TypeIA Mar 11 '21 at 15:17
  • @TypeIA I did not say “harsh on” is ungrammatical; I said and provided evidence that it is quite rare. I am not sure we materially disagree. – Jeff Morrow Mar 11 '21 at 16:22
  • Indeed, that's why I upvoted! – TypeIA Mar 11 '21 at 18:13
  • 1
    @TypeIA Ahh. Thank you. I misread the intent of your comment. – Jeff Morrow Mar 11 '21 at 19:08
  • 4
    The Ngram chart is not a fair comparison because instances like "harsh to + Verb" such as "seems harsh to say" or "harsh to be", or collocations with nouns where "harsh on" wouldn't be used such as "sounds harsh to our ears" are a thumb on the scale for "harsh to". You need to include a pronoun in the comparison to make it a fair race. Check out this chart. – Eddie Kal Mar 12 '21 at 00:36
3

I don't think anyone would look at you wrong if you said it, but using harsh instead of hard is probably more of a malapropism in most cases. That being said, because English is so fluid, "harsh on" could easily become more normal if it's used more.

hakusaro
  • 451
  • 5
  • 7
  • 3
    It's not a malapropism, because harsh and hard are synonyms in this particular usage. However, the phrase "hard on" is an idiom with no sensible literal meaning. As such, changing it is understandable, but a bit weird. I wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot rod. :-) – jpaugh Mar 11 '21 at 23:53