It is sufficient to say that though the proof was invalid, the proposition remained true, and carried with it the truth of such of Carnot's deductions as were based solely upon it.
I had some difficulties in trying to decipher the of such of part.
I think the key resides in understanding the part that comes after the first of
It is sufficient to say that though the proof was invalid, the proposition remained true, and carried with it the truth of [such of Carnot's deductions as were based solely upon it].
But the construction inside the brackets doesn't make much sense either. What does such of even mean?
Full context:
After the invention of the steam-engine in its present form by James Watt, the attention of engineers and of scientific men was directed to the problem of its further improvement. With this end in view, the young Sadi Carnot, in 1824, published the Reflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu, of which this translation is given in this volume. In this really great memoir, Carnot examined the relations between heat and the work done by heat used in an ideal engine, and by reducing the problem to its simplest form and avoiding all special questions relating to details, he succeeded in establishing the conditions upon which the economical working of all heat engines depends. It is not necessary here to animadvert upon the use made by Carnot of the substantial theory of heat, and the consequent failure of the proof of his main proposition when the true nature of heat was appreciated. It is sufficient to say that though the proof was invalid, the proposition remained true, and carried with it the truth of such of Carnot's deductions as were based solely upon it.
Source:The second law of thermodynamics; memoirs by Carnot, Clausius, and Thomson. Written by William Francis Magie. The book can be found here, the quote above lies in the first page of the preface, first paragraph.