Adding the definite article would imply that the introduction would be touching on all topics that are covered in the mentioned research.
Without the article, or rather with the indefinite plural article (which in English happens to be a null article), the writer indicates that the introduction will touch topics from the research, but it may not be all of the topics in the research.
Maybe another example will make it a bit clearer. I'm on apples today somehow, so bear with me.
I like to eat apples. I know a farmer who grows them. Now, if I eat an apple, and it comes from that farmer:
The apple I ate was an apple from the farmer.
If I eat several apples, both the definite and indefinite article change to the plural:
The apples I ate were apples from the farmer.
If in any of the sentences I would use the definite instead of the indefinite article, the meaning of the sentence would change dramatically:
The apple I ate was the apple from the farmer.
Either the farmer only had one apple, or possibly, I had earlier obtained several apples, but only one was from that farmer.
The apples I ate were the apples from the farmer.
Now I ate all the farmer's apples (burp), or indeed, I had earlier obtained several apples, some of which came from the farmer, and I ate those.