3
  1. My glasses (was/were) lying on the table.
  2. My trousers (is/are) torn.
  3. (This/These) binoculars (was/were) gifted to me.

I know they're in plural form, but plural nouns such as rickets, measles are disease names, but they take singular verb.

J.R.
  • 109,547
  • 9
  • 164
  • 291
asr09
  • 163
  • 1
  • 6
  • 19
  • 1
    Some words, such as *trousers, glasses, scissors, are semantically singular, but syntactically plural. Others, such as rickets* and *measles, are semantically and* syntactically singular. I suspect you may just have to learn these on a case-by-case basis. But many of the first group can be identified because they're often used in expressions like a pair* of [glasses, trousers, scissors].* – FumbleFingers Sep 17 '17 at 14:59
  • So all above 3 sentences will be in singular verb form. – asr09 Sep 17 '17 at 15:05
  • 1
    *No!* I said trousers, glasses, scissors, are semantically singular (they mean* "a single thing"), but syntactically plural (we use the plural verb form with them).* So your sentences should be My glasses were* lying on the table, My trousers are torn, These binoculars were gifted to me. Note that in normal conversational contexts we'd usually say given, not gifted* in the last one. – FumbleFingers Sep 17 '17 at 15:14
  • 1
    "Measles" can be singlar or plural. The OED says "usually" singular. Collins says "singular or plural". It's easy to find recent examples of it taking the plural. E.g. Leslie DeLong & Nancy Buckhart, General and Oral Pathology for the Dental Hygienist (2007): "German measles are mostly commonly found in children or adults who have not been vaccinated or exposed...". – rjpond Sep 17 '17 at 17:22
  • Relevant Ngram "measles is/are" – Andrew Sep 17 '17 at 17:30
  • I'm not sure it's particularly relevant that some Anglophones are prepared to treat *measles* as plural. It's just one of OP's two examples, and per this NGram, neither rickets are a disease, nor rickets are diseases occur often enough to chart in NGrams (the "standard" being rickets is* a disease), It's the same with mumps*, and doubtless others – FumbleFingers Sep 18 '17 at 14:02
  • Related answer dealing with diseases and articles: https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/82976/i-got-a-stomach-flu-or-i-got-the-stomach-flu-or-i-got-stomach-flu/82986#82986 Mostly deals with diseases – Adam Sep 19 '17 at 04:18
  • Unrelated to your question: We don't put spaces before commas in English. – Adam Sep 19 '17 at 04:20
  • @FumbleFingers You have enough there for an answer – Adam Sep 19 '17 at 04:20
  • 1
    @Adam: When I wrote you may just have to learn these on a case-by-case basis in my first comment I half-expected / hoped someone would refute me there by setting out some general principles that might be useful (my point about *pair* doesn't help unless you already know the usage for a given word). I wasn't really expecting to be sidetracked by claims that *measles* isn't always syntactically singular (the full OED gives 15 cites for the "infectious disease" sense, none of which are "plural" usages). Diseases in general may be a relevant "syntax category" here, I don't know. – FumbleFingers Sep 19 '17 at 14:34
  • @FumbleFingers choster tried to lay out those guidelines for clothes, with a little success - Perhaps the OP would find his attempt useful: https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/32745/im-wearing-a-red-pant-or-im-wearing-a-red-pants/32763#32763 – Adam Sep 19 '17 at 15:50
  • 2
    @Adam: Pouring petrol on the flames here, I'm tempted to suggest there is* no possible means to cover all usages in a small number of categories.* Not that I'm wild about that usage there - but if it's generally considered "unacceptable", *that is news to me!* :) – FumbleFingers Sep 19 '17 at 16:03

1 Answers1

1

I'm going to shamelessly repurpose the comments to answer this question:

(FumbleFingers) Some words, such as trousers, glasses, scissors, are semantically singular, but syntactically plural. Others, such as rickets and measles, are semantically and syntactically singular. I suspect you may just have to learn these on a case-by-case basis. But many of the first group can be identified because they're often used in expressions like a pair of [glasses, trousers, scissors]. So your sentences should be:

My glasses were lying on the table

My trousers are torn

These binoculars were gifted to me

Side note:

(rjpond) "Measles" (and other diseases) can be singular or plural. The OED says "usually" singular. Collins says "singular or plural". It's easy to find recent examples of it taking the plural. E.g. Leslie DeLong & Nancy Buckhart, General and Oral Pathology for the Dental Hygienist (2007): "German measles are mostly commonly found in children or adults who have not been vaccinated or exposed...".

Side note #2: FumbleFingers says that "these binoculars were given to me" is more common than "these binoculars were gifted to me". I actually prefer to use "to gift" as a verb where appropriate, so it's likely just personal choice.

Andrew
  • 88,266
  • 6
  • 98
  • 187
  • Is the use of given and gifted not dependant on context? In the original example it is clear they were gifted so now they belong to a new owner. However given could mean issued/lent and should be returned at a latter date." we were given the keys to the boss's car" Hence the use of "given" does not specify ownership, just that the object was not "acquired" by yourself. – Brad Mar 19 '21 at 06:29