3

Actually I have this question for long time. As I started to use contracted words like I've , it's, you're (verb with subject), and due to habit of shorting verb+not like haven't, isn't etc, eventually I came to write words that are contracted twice e.g I'ven't, it'sn't, you'ren't etc.

But I suspect about correctness of it since that I've never found such twice contraction in a sentence. So, finally I has come to ask: Is it ok to contract and combine more than one words simultaneously?

I mean combining effects of I've + not & I + haven't to I'ven't! and similar possible word contractions.

Pandya
  • 1,202
  • 6
  • 17
  • 31
  • Set the way-back machine to question number 50 on ELU: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/50/can-a-word-be-contracted-twice-e-g-ivent – Davo May 30 '17 at 18:05
  • Generally, it's best not to make any more contractions. There are a certain number of accepted contractions in English, and that group nearly never grows outside of local dialects. – Stephen S May 30 '17 at 18:18
  • No, no and no. There are no double contractions. They are two choices sometimes, however: He isn't rich or He's not rich. Your examples are not correct. I've not seen him today (usually British); I haven't see him today (usually American). Just two examples. – Lambie May 30 '17 at 19:30

2 Answers2

5

Contraction of VERB+not (isn't, haven't, &c) occurs only when the verb is stressed; but contraction of NOUN+VERB or PRONOUN+VERB (Jack's, she'd, I've, &c) occurs only when the verb is unstressed.

A verb can't be stressed and unstressed at the same time; so these “double” contractions are not valid English.

StoneyB on hiatus
  • 175,127
  • 14
  • 260
  • 461
-1

No. There are specific words like 'not' or verbs 'is and 'have' come to mind, that contracted with a pronoun are fine in English usage. Your use of I'ven't isnt a word and isnt easily even interpreted meaningfully. It looks like 'I vent', with entirely different meaning.

Your combination of I have not must be I haven't. Anything other than that would not be standard English usage. Hope that helps you.

Amanda_M
  • 27
  • 1