2

I came across this idea while looking to buy a house and I wondered if there was a term for it. The initial purchase options have a linear cost to value relationship. However, I'm tempted to make a larger purchase than planned because the additional value is proportionately much higher.

Simple Example:

  • Option 1: Cost = 3, Value = 3
  • Option 2: Cost = 5, Value = 5
  • Option 3: Cost = 7, Value = 10
RWL01
  • 123
  • 2
  • 7
    The title of the question seems to be referring to the sunk cost fallacy (https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/the-sunk-cost-fallacy) but the description makes me wonder if it's just a convex utility function – Ishan Kashyap Hazarika May 17 '22 at 21:14

2 Answers2

0

From a Production Theory standpoint, I would argue that you have a convex "production function" (input = Cost, output = Value). In other words, the house purchase has increasing returns to scale.

0

I can't see anything but utility maximization here. With a quasilinear utility function, u = v - c, the first two options yield $u=0$ while the third one yields $u=3$.

VARulle
  • 6,805
  • 10
  • 25